X-ray emission from supernovae in dense circumstellar matter environments: A search for collisionless shocks

E. O. Ofek, D. Fox, S. B. Cenko, M. Sullivan, O. Gnat, D. A. Frail, A. Horesh, A. Corsi, R. M. Quimby, N. Gehrels, S. R. Kulkarni, A. Gal-Yam, P. E. Nugent, O. Yaron, A. V. Filippenko, M. M. Kasliwal, L. Bildsten, J. S. Bloom, D. Poznanski, I. ArcaviR. R. Laher, D. Levitan, B. Sesar, J. Surace

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

56 Scopus citations

Abstract

The optical light curve of some supernovae (SNe) may be powered by the outward diffusion of the energy deposited by the explosion shock (the so-called shock breakout) in optically thick (τ ≳ 30) circumstellar matter (CSM). Recently, it was shown that the radiation-mediated and radiation-dominated shock in an optically thick wind must transform into a collisionless shock and can produce hard X-rays. The X-rays are expected to peak at late times, relative to maximum visible light. Here we report on a search, using Swift/XRT and Chandra, for X-ray emission from 28 SNe that belong to classes whose progenitors are suspected to be embedded in dense CSM. Our sample includes 19 Type IIn SNe, one Type Ibn SN, and eight hydrogen-poor superluminous SNe (SLSN-I such as SN 2005ap). Two SNe (SN 2006jc and SN 2010jl) have X-ray properties that are roughly consistent with the expectation for X-rays from a collisionless shock in optically thick CSM. However, the X-ray emission from SN 2006jc can also be explained as originating in an optically thin region. Thus, we propose that the optical light curve of SN 2010jl is powered by shock breakout in CSM. We suggest that two other events (SN 2010al and SN 2011ht) were too X-ray bright during the SN maximum optical light to be explained by the shock-breakout model. We conclude that the light curves of some, but not all, SNe IIn/Ibn are powered by shock breakout in CSM. For the rest of the SNe in our sample, including all of the SLSN-I events, our X-ray limits are not deep enough and were typically obtained too early (i.e., near the SN maximum light) for definitive conclusions about their nature. Late-time X-ray observations are required in order to further test whether these SNe are indeed embedded in dense CSM. We review the conditions required for a shock breakout in a wind profile. We argue that the timescale, relative to maximum light, for the SN to peak in X-rays is a probe of the column density and the density profile above the shock region. In SNe whose X-ray emission slowly rises, and peaks at late times, the optical light curve is likely powered by the diffusion of shock energy in a dense CSM. We note that if the CSM density profile falls faster than a constant-rate wind-density profile, then X-rays may escape at earlier times than estimated for the wind-profile case. Furthermore, if the CSM has a region in which the density profile is very steep relative to a steady wind-density profile, or if the CSM is neutral, then the radio free-free absorption may be sufficiently low for radio emission to be detected.

Original languageEnglish
Article number42
JournalAstrophysical Journal
Volume763
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 20 2013

Keywords

  • stars: mass-loss
  • supernovae: general
  • supernovae: individual (SN 2006jc, SN 2010jl)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'X-ray emission from supernovae in dense circumstellar matter environments: A search for collisionless shocks'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this