Voices in the dark: Predation risk by owls influences dusk singing in a diurnal passerine

Kenneth A. Schmidt, Kara Loeb Belinsky

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

46 Scopus citations

Abstract

Predation is an important cost of communication in animals and thus a potent selection pressure on the evolution of signaling behavior. Heterospecific eavesdropping by predators may increase the vulnerability of vocalizing prey, particularly during low light, such as at dusk when nocturnal predators are actively hunting. Despite the risk it entails, dawn and dusk chorusing is common in passerines. However, the dusk chorus has not been studied much, neglecting the opportunity for understanding how eavesdropping between predators and prey may shape communication in birds. Here, we report the first demonstration of simulated predation risk (playback of owl vocalizations) altering the dusk chorus of a diurnal passerine, the veery (Catharus fuscescens). Veeries have a pronounced dusk chorus, singing well after sunset and potentially exposing themselves to predation by owls. In response to brief playbacks of owl calls (~30 s of calls presented three times over 25 min), veeries sang fewer songs post-sunset and stopped singing earlier relative to control trials. These changes in singing remained evident 30 min after the last owl stimulus. Although the avian dusk chorus has received relatively little attention to date, our results suggest that the dusk chorus may pose a higher predation risk to singing males that may influence the evolution of singing behavior in diurnal birds.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1837-1843
Number of pages7
JournalBehavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
Volume67
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2013

Keywords

  • Animal communication
  • Dusk chorus
  • Heterospecific eavesdropping
  • Predation risk
  • Veery

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Voices in the dark: Predation risk by owls influences dusk singing in a diurnal passerine'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this