Training versus monitoring: A qualitative examination of athletic department practices regarding student-athletes and Twitter

James Sanderson, Blair Browning

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Twitter has created a number of issues for collegiate athletic programs. Via their tweets, student-athletes have sparked public relations issues for athletic departments and educational institutions. This research examined the messages student-athletes receive from athletic department officials and coaches about Twitter. Semi-structured interviews with 20 student-athletes at a Division I school were conducted. Results revealed that these messages occurred in 1 of 3 areas: (a) (non)training, (b) surveillance=monitoring, and (c) reactive training. The results indicate that student-athletes are left to their interpretations of what constitutes inappropriate Twitter content while also being subjected to monitoring. Education about Twitter typically occurs after a violation of an unclear or unknown policy. This reactionary and ambiguous approach to Twitter appears to be doing little to mitigate controversial tweets. Athletic administrators are encouraged to devote resources to front-end, r
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)105-111
JournalQualitative Research Reports in Communication
StatePublished - 2013

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Training versus monitoring: A qualitative examination of athletic department practices regarding student-athletes and Twitter'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this