Toxicity, survivability, and activity patterns of northern bobwhite quail dosed with the insecticide terbufos

Rone A. Brewer, Linda L. Carlock, Michael J. Hooper, Larry W. Brewer, George P. Cobb, Ronald J. Kendall

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

10 Scopus citations

Abstract

The effects of the organophosphorus insecticide terbufos on laboratory reared and wild northern bobwhites (Colinus virginianus) were investigated in laboratory dosing studies and dose-release field trials. Laboratory studies yielded a terbufos LD50 of 24.4 mg/kg-body weight (bw). All mortalities occurred within the first 24 h post-dose. Wild bobwhites were trapped, administered 0, 3, 5.6, or 21 mg/kg-bw terbufos by oral intubation, released at their trapping site, and monitored for 14 d. Mortality, activity, and locational data were recorded. Bobwhites treated with 21 mg/kg-bw terbufos had significantly lower survival (p = 0.04) than control birds, while survival at the lower doses was unaffected. No significant differences (p = 0.06) were detected in physical activity among treatments. The 21-mg/kg-bw dose yields an anticipated 37% mortality (or LD37) when interpolated from the LD50 slope equation. After adjustment for control mortality, the 21-mg/kg-bw dose led to 44% mortality in wild bobwhites. This was a 7% higher mortality than predicted by interpolation from the laboratory generated LD50. These results indicate that there was not a substantial increase in mortality of wild bobwhites compared to laboratory reared bobwhites at nonlethal or lethal, sub-LD50, doses.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)750-753
Number of pages4
JournalEnvironmental Toxicology and Chemistry
Volume15
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1996

Keywords

  • Counter®
  • Northern bobwhite
  • Organophosphorus insecticide
  • Survival
  • Terbufos

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Toxicity, survivability, and activity patterns of northern bobwhite quail dosed with the insecticide terbufos'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this