TY - JOUR
T1 - Top Five Physical Design Factors Contributing to Fall Initiation
AU - Pati, Debajyoti
AU - Lee, Jaehoon
AU - Mihandoust, Sahar
AU - Kazem-Zadeh, Mahshad
AU - Oh, Youngha
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This work was supported by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (grant number 1R03HS025021-01).
Funding Information:
The authors would like to thank Thomas E. Harvey, Jr., FAIA, MPH, FACHA, LEED AP, of HKS Health and Patricia Freier, MSN, RN-BC, RCIS, CPHQ, of Covenant Health for serving as expert critique of the study phase reported in this article; Kristin Abrahamson and Sharon Holliman of Texas Tech University, Department of Design, for providing undergraduate research support for the study phase reported in this article; and Shabboo Valipoor, PhD, assistant professor at University of Florida, for contribution in preparing the data for analysis, in the study phase reported in this article. The authors disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This work was supported by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (grant number 1R03HS025021-01).
Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2018.
PY - 2018/10/1
Y1 - 2018/10/1
N2 - Purpose: To develop a prioritized list of physical design questions/interventions to reduce patient falls by conducting expanded analysis (Phase II) of data generated from a completed study phase. Background: Patient falls continue to be a critical concern for healthcare providers, patients, and families. While substantial literature exist on intrinsic factors, scientific evidence on the role of the physical environment is scarce. Method: Expanded analysis of data from 180 videos of trials conducted in a physical mock-up of a medical–surgical inpatient room in a previously completed study phase. The odds of subject’s exhibited postures (predictors) on fall initiation (outcome) were examined in a series of generalized linear mixed effects models. Physical design elements and attributes associated with postures exhibiting statistical significance were examined. Results: Turning, pulling, pushing, and bending forward exhibited the highest odds of contributing to fall initiation in the bathroom. Grabbing, pushing, and sitting exhibited the highest odds of contributing to fall initiation around the patient bed. Physical design elements/attributes associated with the above postures are the (1) bathroom door; (2) bathroom spatial configuration—relative locations of door, toilet bowl, and the sink; (3) door, toilet, and sink hardware; (4) space availability/tightness inside the clinician zone; and (5) spatial configuration around patient bed—relative locations of bed, patient chair, and overbed table, in relation to bathroom door, and resulting obstructions originating from the configuration. Conclusions: Patient falls during unassisted ambulation may be reduced through appropriate examination of these five physical elements/attributes.
AB - Purpose: To develop a prioritized list of physical design questions/interventions to reduce patient falls by conducting expanded analysis (Phase II) of data generated from a completed study phase. Background: Patient falls continue to be a critical concern for healthcare providers, patients, and families. While substantial literature exist on intrinsic factors, scientific evidence on the role of the physical environment is scarce. Method: Expanded analysis of data from 180 videos of trials conducted in a physical mock-up of a medical–surgical inpatient room in a previously completed study phase. The odds of subject’s exhibited postures (predictors) on fall initiation (outcome) were examined in a series of generalized linear mixed effects models. Physical design elements and attributes associated with postures exhibiting statistical significance were examined. Results: Turning, pulling, pushing, and bending forward exhibited the highest odds of contributing to fall initiation in the bathroom. Grabbing, pushing, and sitting exhibited the highest odds of contributing to fall initiation around the patient bed. Physical design elements/attributes associated with the above postures are the (1) bathroom door; (2) bathroom spatial configuration—relative locations of door, toilet bowl, and the sink; (3) door, toilet, and sink hardware; (4) space availability/tightness inside the clinician zone; and (5) spatial configuration around patient bed—relative locations of bed, patient chair, and overbed table, in relation to bathroom door, and resulting obstructions originating from the configuration. Conclusions: Patient falls during unassisted ambulation may be reduced through appropriate examination of these five physical elements/attributes.
KW - hospital
KW - patient falls
KW - patient room design
KW - patient safety
KW - physical design
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85044935049&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/1937586718763798
DO - 10.1177/1937586718763798
M3 - Article
C2 - 29592771
AN - SCOPUS:85044935049
SN - 1937-5867
VL - 11
SP - 50
EP - 64
JO - Health Environments Research and Design Journal
JF - Health Environments Research and Design Journal
IS - 4
ER -