TY - JOUR
T1 - Timing of precision agriculture technology adoption in US cotton production
AU - Watcharaanantapong, Pattarawan
AU - Roberts, Roland K.
AU - Lambert, Dayton M.
AU - Larson, James A.
AU - Velandia, Margarita
AU - English, Burton C.
AU - Rejesus, Roderick M.
AU - Wang, Chenggang
N1 - Funding Information:
Acknowledgments This research was funded by Cotton Incorporated and the agricultural research institutions at the University of Florida, Louisiana State University, Mississippi State University, North Carolina State University, University of Tennessee, and Texas Tech University. The authors thank the anonymous reviewers for providing useful comments and suggestions.
Publisher Copyright:
© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013.
PY - 2014/11/1
Y1 - 2014/11/1
N2 - The timing of technology adoption is influenced by profitability and farmer ability to bear risk. Innovators are typically more risk tolerant than laggards. Understanding the factors influencing early adoption of precision agriculture (PA) technologies by cotton farmers is important for anticipating technology diffusion over time. The factors influencing the timing of grid soil sampling (GSS), yield monitoring (YMR) and remote sensing (RMS) adoption by cotton producers was evaluated using multivariate censored regression. Data for cotton farmers in 12 states were obtained from a survey conducted in 2009. The factors hypothesized to influence the timing of adoption included farm characteristics, operator characteristics, PA information sources, adoption of other PA technologies, and farm location. The results suggest that different factors influenced when cotton farmers adopted GSS, YMR and RMS after these technologies became commercially available. For example, land ownership was associated with the timing of GSS adoption, but not YMR or RMS adoption; farmer age was correlated with the timing of GSS and YMR adoption, but not RMS adoption; and obtaining PA information from consultants affected the timing of GSS and RMS adoption, but not YMR adoption. The only factors correlated with the early adoption of all three technologies were beliefs that PA would improve environmental quality and the adoption of at least one other PA technology. Thus, the potential for improved environmental quality appears to be a strong adoption motivator across PA technologies, as is the earlier adoption of other PA technologies. This research may be useful for farmers, researchers, Extension personnel, machinery manufacturers, PA information providers and agricultural retailers to anticipate the future adoption of new and emerging PA technologies.
AB - The timing of technology adoption is influenced by profitability and farmer ability to bear risk. Innovators are typically more risk tolerant than laggards. Understanding the factors influencing early adoption of precision agriculture (PA) technologies by cotton farmers is important for anticipating technology diffusion over time. The factors influencing the timing of grid soil sampling (GSS), yield monitoring (YMR) and remote sensing (RMS) adoption by cotton producers was evaluated using multivariate censored regression. Data for cotton farmers in 12 states were obtained from a survey conducted in 2009. The factors hypothesized to influence the timing of adoption included farm characteristics, operator characteristics, PA information sources, adoption of other PA technologies, and farm location. The results suggest that different factors influenced when cotton farmers adopted GSS, YMR and RMS after these technologies became commercially available. For example, land ownership was associated with the timing of GSS adoption, but not YMR or RMS adoption; farmer age was correlated with the timing of GSS and YMR adoption, but not RMS adoption; and obtaining PA information from consultants affected the timing of GSS and RMS adoption, but not YMR adoption. The only factors correlated with the early adoption of all three technologies were beliefs that PA would improve environmental quality and the adoption of at least one other PA technology. Thus, the potential for improved environmental quality appears to be a strong adoption motivator across PA technologies, as is the earlier adoption of other PA technologies. This research may be useful for farmers, researchers, Extension personnel, machinery manufacturers, PA information providers and agricultural retailers to anticipate the future adoption of new and emerging PA technologies.
KW - Grid soil sampling
KW - Multivariate Tobit
KW - Precision agriculture
KW - Remote sensing
KW - Timing of adoption
KW - Yield monitors
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84917741211&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s11119-013-9338-1
DO - 10.1007/s11119-013-9338-1
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84917741211
SN - 1385-2256
VL - 15
SP - 427
EP - 446
JO - Precision Agriculture
JF - Precision Agriculture
IS - 4
ER -