Things are us! A commentary on human/things relations under the banner of a 'social' archaeology

Timothy Webmoor, Christopher L. Witmore

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

158 Scopus citations

Abstract

What work does the adjective 'social' in social archaeology do? What is the character of human/things relations under the rubric of social archaeology? We raise these questions in relation to the recent Companion to Social Archaeology by Meskell and Preucel. While the corrective of the 'social' has been extremely productive, in broaching these questions we enter very murky waters. Our task in this article is to show where meanings of the 'social' have broken down; our charge is to demonstrate how frames of reference in understanding people/things relations have become muddled. By building on the strength of archaeology with regard to things, we seek to revisit the question: what is it to be human?

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)53-70
Number of pages18
JournalNorwegian Archaeological Review
Volume41
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2008

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Things are us! A commentary on human/things relations under the banner of a 'social' archaeology'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this