The taxonomic status of wild Canis in Arkansas

Philip S. Gipson, John A. Sealander, James E. Dunn

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Scopus citations

Abstract

Skulls from 284 wild canids collected in Arkansas from July, 1968 through March, 1971 approximately one year old or older and of known sex and capture locality were analyzed taxonomically. Each skull was compared to six target populations of skulls from known canids (Bcoyotes, coyote × dog hybrids, dogs, red wolves, northeastern forest gray wolves, and plains gray wolves) for identification. The 165 male unknowns were identified as: coyote, 117;B coyote ×dog intermediate, 26; dog, 3;red wolf, 2; coyote × red wolf intermediate, 16; dog × red wolf intermediate, 1. The 119 female unknowns were identified as: coyote, 91; coyote × dog intermediate, 12; dog, 5; coyote × red wolf intermediate, 11. Coyotes occur in all counties of the state and are the predominant wild canid in most areas. Local pockets of coyote × dog intermediates are randomly distributed but fairly common. Wild dogs have become established in some areas, especially in east-central Arkansas. A strong red wolf influence still exists in the canid population on the Gulf Coastal Plain of southern Arkansas. Occasional pockets of red wolf influence are found in the Ouachita and Ozark Mountains and Delta.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-11
Number of pages11
JournalSystematic biology
Volume23
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1974

Keywords

  • Corns
  • Hybridization

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'The taxonomic status of wild Canis in Arkansas'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this