The Sharp Corners of ACA Premium Tax Credit Provisions

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The Tax Court has started issuing more and more opinions dealing with disputes over the proper application of the Premium Tax Credit Provisions in §36B. Those opinions show that the Court views §36B as containing no wiggle room to deal with reasonable taxpayer errors in calculating their Premium Tax Credit (PTC). Multiple times one sees the Court writing phrases such as “We are not unsympathetic to petitioners’ plight; however, we are bound by the statute,” and “we cannot ignore the law to achieve an equitable end.”<br><br>The Court's doggedly textualist reading results in taxpayers getting hit with really big deficiencies, even when the error is someone else’s fault. Recent cases have done this, turning receipt of lump sum SSDI payments into a “gotcha” game that even reasonable taxpayers will lose if they make the §86(e) election to attribute a lump sum payment ratably over prior years.<br><br>In the recent fully reviewed case of Johnson v. Commissioner, the question was whether an S
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2001-2006
JournalTax Notes
StatePublished - Jun 24 2019

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Sharp Corners of ACA Premium Tax Credit Provisions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this