The physiologic response of exercising in the water and on land with and without the X1000 walk ‘N tone exercise belt

Jacalyn J. Robert; Laura Jones; Mike Bobo

doi:10.1080/02701367.1996.10607958

The physiologic response of exercising in the water and on land with and without the X1000 walk ‘N tone exercise belt

Jacalyn J. Robert, Laura Jones, Mike Bobo

Kinesiology and Sport Management

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

14 Scopus citations

Abstract

Study of the physiological effects of exercise that decreases lower joint impact is needed. Participants (N = 18) were exposed to either land or water exercise that included or did not include wearing a belt. Physiological variables of caloric expenditure, net oxygen cost, net oxygen pulse, and heart rate were assessed A 2 × 2 (Environment × Belt) analysis of variance (ANOVA) revealed a significant environment main effect for net oxygen cost and caloric expenditure. Water actually decreased the energy cost of the exercise. A 2 × 2 × 4 (Environment × Belt × Time) ANOVA revealed a significant environment main effect for net oxygen cost and caloric expenditure. Specifically, land heart rates increased over time, whereas water heart rates did not.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	310-315
Number of pages	6
Journal	Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport
Volume	67
Issue number	3
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.1996.10607958
State	Published - Sep 1996

Keywords

Caloric cost
Heart rate response
Net oxygen cost
Water exercise

Access to Document

10.1080/02701367.1996.10607958

Cite this

@article{9a401bd213bd4348a2a4225017eaa457,

title = "The physiologic response of exercising in the water and on land with and without the X1000 walk {\textquoteleft}N tone exercise belt",

abstract = "Study of the physiological effects of exercise that decreases lower joint impact is needed. Participants (N = 18) were exposed to either land or water exercise that included or did not include wearing a belt. Physiological variables of caloric expenditure, net oxygen cost, net oxygen pulse, and heart rate were assessed A 2 × 2 (Environment × Belt) analysis of variance (ANOVA) revealed a significant environment main effect for net oxygen cost and caloric expenditure. Water actually decreased the energy cost of the exercise. A 2 × 2 × 4 (Environment × Belt × Time) ANOVA revealed a significant environment main effect for net oxygen cost and caloric expenditure. Specifically, land heart rates increased over time, whereas water heart rates did not.",

keywords = "Caloric cost, Heart rate response, Net oxygen cost, Water exercise",

author = "Robert, {Jacalyn J.} and Laura Jones and Mike Bobo",

year = "1996",

month = sep,

doi = "10.1080/02701367.1996.10607958",

language = "English",

volume = "67",

pages = "310--315",

journal = "Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport",

issn = "0270-1367",

number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The physiologic response of exercising in the water and on land with and without the X1000 walk ‘N tone exercise belt

AU - Robert, Jacalyn J.

AU - Jones, Laura

AU - Bobo, Mike

PY - 1996/9

Y1 - 1996/9

N2 - Study of the physiological effects of exercise that decreases lower joint impact is needed. Participants (N = 18) were exposed to either land or water exercise that included or did not include wearing a belt. Physiological variables of caloric expenditure, net oxygen cost, net oxygen pulse, and heart rate were assessed A 2 × 2 (Environment × Belt) analysis of variance (ANOVA) revealed a significant environment main effect for net oxygen cost and caloric expenditure. Water actually decreased the energy cost of the exercise. A 2 × 2 × 4 (Environment × Belt × Time) ANOVA revealed a significant environment main effect for net oxygen cost and caloric expenditure. Specifically, land heart rates increased over time, whereas water heart rates did not.

AB - Study of the physiological effects of exercise that decreases lower joint impact is needed. Participants (N = 18) were exposed to either land or water exercise that included or did not include wearing a belt. Physiological variables of caloric expenditure, net oxygen cost, net oxygen pulse, and heart rate were assessed A 2 × 2 (Environment × Belt) analysis of variance (ANOVA) revealed a significant environment main effect for net oxygen cost and caloric expenditure. Water actually decreased the energy cost of the exercise. A 2 × 2 × 4 (Environment × Belt × Time) ANOVA revealed a significant environment main effect for net oxygen cost and caloric expenditure. Specifically, land heart rates increased over time, whereas water heart rates did not.

KW - Caloric cost

KW - Heart rate response

KW - Net oxygen cost

KW - Water exercise

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030228425&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/02701367.1996.10607958

DO - 10.1080/02701367.1996.10607958

M3 - Article

C2 - 8888419

AN - SCOPUS:0030228425

VL - 67

SP - 310

EP - 315

JO - Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport

JF - Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport

SN - 0270-1367

IS - 3

ER -

The physiologic response of exercising in the water and on land with and without the X1000 walk ‘N tone exercise belt

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this