The limits of liberalism: Good boundaries must be discovered

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Scopus citations


Determining good boundaries for governance jurisdictions is among the most difficult problems in political theory and political philosophy. But to whom the rules of a given jurisdiction applies is a problem that afflicts private as well as public governance. Clubs have boundaries no less than cities, states, or nations. This essay applies Hayek’s conception of competition as a discovery procedure to boundary problems, arguing that good jurisdictional boundaries are subject to a great deal of contingent variation according to particular the conditions of time and place. Philosophical speculation, therefore, cannot fully replace a trial and error process that facilitates social learning about where good boundaries fall. I outline the features of good boundaries that make them subject to such variation, then evaluate two criteria for evaluating whether existing jurisdictional boundaries are good: one that emphasizes ex ante consent to boundaries, and one that focuses on the ability of individuals to exit from jurisdictions ex post, arguing that the exit-focused approach is underappreciated.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)265-276
Number of pages12
JournalReview of Austrian Economics
Issue number2
StatePublished - Jun 1 2018


  • Clubs
  • Competition
  • Governance
  • Jurisdictions


Dive into the research topics of 'The limits of liberalism: Good boundaries must be discovered'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this