TY - JOUR
T1 - The late-time afterglow evolution of long gamma-ray bursts GRB 160625B and GRB 160509A
AU - Kangas, Tuomas
AU - Fruchter, Andrew S.
AU - Cenko, S. Bradley
AU - Corsi, Alessandra
AU - de Ugarte Postigo, Antonio
AU - Pe’er, Asaf
AU - Vogel, Stuart N.
AU - Cucchiara, Antonino
AU - Gompertz, Benjamin
AU - Graham, John
AU - Levan, Andrew
AU - Misra, Kuntal
AU - Perley, Daniel A.
AU - Racusin, Judith
AU - Tanvir, Nial
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2019, The Authors. All rights reserved.
Copyright:
Copyright 2020 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2019/6/8
Y1 - 2019/6/8
N2 - We present post-jet-break HST, VLA and Chandra observations of the afterglow of the long γ-ray bursts GRB 160625B (between 69 and 209 days) and GRB 160509A (between 35 and 80 days). We calculate the post-jet-break decline rates of the light curves, and find the afterglow of GRB 160625B inconsistent with a simple t−3/4 steepening over the break, expected from the geometric effect of the jet edge entering our line of sight. However, the favored optical post-break decline (fν ∝ t−1.96±0.07) is also inconsistent with the fν ∝ t−p decline (where p ≈ 2.3 from the pre-break light curve), which is expected from exponential lateral expansion of the jet; perhaps suggesting lateral expansion that only affects a fraction of the jet. The post-break decline of GRB 160509A is consistent with both the t−3/4 steepening and with fν ∝ t−p. We also use boxfit to fit afterglow models to both light curves and find both to be energetically consistent with a millisecond magnetar central engine, although the magnetar parameters need to be extreme (i.e. E ∼ 3 × 1052 erg). Finally, the late-time radio light curves of both afterglows are not reproduced well by boxfit and are inconsistent with predictions from the standard jet model; instead both are well represented by a single power law decline (roughly fν ∝ t−1) with no breaks. This requires a highly chromatic jet break (tj,radio > 10 × tj,optical) and possibly a two-component jet for both bursts.
AB - We present post-jet-break HST, VLA and Chandra observations of the afterglow of the long γ-ray bursts GRB 160625B (between 69 and 209 days) and GRB 160509A (between 35 and 80 days). We calculate the post-jet-break decline rates of the light curves, and find the afterglow of GRB 160625B inconsistent with a simple t−3/4 steepening over the break, expected from the geometric effect of the jet edge entering our line of sight. However, the favored optical post-break decline (fν ∝ t−1.96±0.07) is also inconsistent with the fν ∝ t−p decline (where p ≈ 2.3 from the pre-break light curve), which is expected from exponential lateral expansion of the jet; perhaps suggesting lateral expansion that only affects a fraction of the jet. The post-break decline of GRB 160509A is consistent with both the t−3/4 steepening and with fν ∝ t−p. We also use boxfit to fit afterglow models to both light curves and find both to be energetically consistent with a millisecond magnetar central engine, although the magnetar parameters need to be extreme (i.e. E ∼ 3 × 1052 erg). Finally, the late-time radio light curves of both afterglows are not reproduced well by boxfit and are inconsistent with predictions from the standard jet model; instead both are well represented by a single power law decline (roughly fν ∝ t−1) with no breaks. This requires a highly chromatic jet break (tj,radio > 10 × tj,optical) and possibly a two-component jet for both bursts.
KW - Gamma-ray burst: general
KW - Gamma-ray burst: individual (GRB 160625B; GRB 160509A)
KW - Relativistic processes
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85098334662&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85098334662
JO - Unknown Journal
JF - Unknown Journal
ER -