The Influence of Status on the Relationship between Intergroup Contact, Threat, and Prejudice in the Context of a Nation-building Intervention in Malaysia

Ananthi Al Ramiah, Miles Hewstone, Todd D. Little, Kyle Lang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

10 Scopus citations

Abstract

We assessed whether intergroup contact at a nation-building intervention in Malaysia improved participants’ perceptions of threat and outgroup evaluations and whether this process was conceptually moderated by group status in a three-group setting. We found evidence of a strong relationship between post-intervention contact and post-intervention outgroup evaluations in all groups and evidence of indirect effects of post-intervention contact on outgroup evaluations by symbolic threat for the minority groups rating the majority group. We found that in the context of institutional inequalities, integrated threat theory may not be sufficiently complex to uncover the processes that underlie the contact–attitude link for majority groups rating minority groups. Further, we found indirect effects of post-intervention contact on outgroup evaluations via realistic threat for interminority group ratings. Thus, we elucidate some of the different mechanisms that underlie the intergroup perceptions of majority and minority group members.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1202-1229
Number of pages28
JournalJournal of Conflict Resolution
Volume58
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2014

Keywords

  • group status
  • integrated threat theory
  • intergroup contact
  • intervention

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'The Influence of Status on the Relationship between Intergroup Contact, Threat, and Prejudice in the Context of a Nation-building Intervention in Malaysia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this