The evaluation of human hand odor volatiles on various textiles: A comparison between contact and noncontact sampling methods

Paola A. Prada, Allison M. Curran, Kenneth G. Furton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

67 Scopus citations

Abstract

The focus of this study is to compare contact and noncontact human scent collection procedures across an array of textiles (cotton, rayon, polyester, and wool) to determine an optimized collection method for human scent evidence. Six subjects were sampled in triplicate for each textile and collection mode, and the samples were then analyzed through headspace solid-phase micro-extraction in combination with gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (SPME-GC/MS). Contact sampling with cotton material has been shown to be the collection method that yielded the greatest number of volatile compounds and the highest scent mass amounts. Through Spearman rank correlations, it was shown that an individual's scent profile is more reproducible within samples collected on the same textile type than between different materials. Furthermore, contact sampling with cotton fabric demonstrated the greatest reproducibility producing the lowest amount of type I and type II errors with 90.85% of the samples distinguished at the 0.9 match/no match threshold.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)866-881
Number of pages16
JournalJournal of Forensic Sciences
Volume56
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2011

Keywords

  • Contact and noncontact methods
  • Fiber chemistries
  • Forensic science
  • Human scent collection
  • Scent Transfer Unit (STU-100)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The evaluation of human hand odor volatiles on various textiles: A comparison between contact and noncontact sampling methods'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this