The ethics of wildlife research: A nine R theory

Howard J. Curzer, Mark C. Wallace, Gad Perry, Peter J. Muhlberger, Dan Perry

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

13 Scopus citations

Abstract

The commonsense ethical constraints on laboratory animal research known as the three Rs are widely accepted, but no constraints tailored to research on animals in the wild are available. In this article, we begin to fill that gap. We sketch a set of commonsense ethical constraints on ecosystem research parallel to the constraints that govern laboratory animal research. Then we combine the animal and ecosystem constraints into a single theory to govern research on animals in the wild.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)52-57
Number of pages6
JournalILAR Journal
Volume54
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2013

Keywords

  • Ecosystem
  • Ethics
  • Reduction
  • Refinement
  • Replacement
  • Three Rs
  • Wildlife research

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'The ethics of wildlife research: A nine R theory'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this