The Effectiveness of Two Methods of Correcting Formal Error

Angela Eaton

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

2 Scopus citations

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	79-83
Number of pages	5
Journal	Business Communication Quarterly
Volume	66
Issue number	2
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1177/108056990306600209
State	Published - Jun 2003

Access to Document

@article{c1cda1f1f4194185a2ab53b1ef3d39ee,

title = "The Effectiveness of Two Methods of Correcting Formal Error",

author = "Angela Eaton",

year = "2003",

month = jun,

doi = "10.1177/108056990306600209",

language = "English",

volume = "66",

pages = "79--83",

journal = "Business Communication Quarterly",

issn = "1080-5699",

number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Effectiveness of Two Methods of Correcting Formal Error

AU - Eaton, Angela

PY - 2003/6

Y1 - 2003/6

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84992827628&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/108056990306600209

DO - 10.1177/108056990306600209

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84992827628

SN - 1080-5699

VL - 66

SP - 79

EP - 83

JO - Business Communication Quarterly

JF - Business Communication Quarterly

IS - 2

ER -