Talking About Trayvon in 140 Characters: Exploring NFL Players’ Tweets About the George Zimmerman Verdict

Annelie Schmittel; Jimmy Sanderson

doi:10.1177/0193723514557821

Talking About Trayvon in 140 Characters: Exploring NFL Players’ Tweets About the George Zimmerman Verdict

Annelie Schmittel, Jimmy Sanderson

Kinesiology and Sport Management

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

30 Scopus citations

Abstract

This research explored how National Football League (NFL) players used Twitter to discuss the verdict in the George Zimmerman murder trial in the immediate aftermath of its announcement. A textual analysis, using constant comparative procedures of 465 tweets from 125 NFL players, was conducted. Results revealed that players discussed the case in the following ways: (a) anticipation, (b) disbelief, (c) critiques of the American Justice System, (d) social commentary, (e) condolences and support, (f) responding to fans, and (g) freedom of speech arguments. The results suggest that Twitter is a viable mechanism for African American and other minority athletes to engage in activism and initiate important conversations about social justice issues. Although empowering, this also may create conflict for team personnel and fans who may be uncomfortable with athletes using Twitter to question structures that favor Whiteness.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	332-345
Number of pages	14
Journal	Journal of Sport and Social Issues
Volume	39
Issue number	4
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1177/0193723514557821
State	Published - Aug 16 2015

Keywords

activism
identity
race and sport
social justice
sport and Twitter

Access to Document

10.1177/0193723514557821

Link to publication in Scopus

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Talking About Trayvon in 140 Characters: Exploring NFL Players’ Tweets About the George Zimmerman Verdict'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this

@article{72aff3e8b5b1402d80b4e95791ef59b8,

title = "Talking About Trayvon in 140 Characters: Exploring NFL Players{\textquoteright} Tweets About the George Zimmerman Verdict",

abstract = "This research explored how National Football League (NFL) players used Twitter to discuss the verdict in the George Zimmerman murder trial in the immediate aftermath of its announcement. A textual analysis, using constant comparative procedures of 465 tweets from 125 NFL players, was conducted. Results revealed that players discussed the case in the following ways: (a) anticipation, (b) disbelief, (c) critiques of the American Justice System, (d) social commentary, (e) condolences and support, (f) responding to fans, and (g) freedom of speech arguments. The results suggest that Twitter is a viable mechanism for African American and other minority athletes to engage in activism and initiate important conversations about social justice issues. Although empowering, this also may create conflict for team personnel and fans who may be uncomfortable with athletes using Twitter to question structures that favor Whiteness.",

keywords = "activism, identity, race and sport, social justice, sport and Twitter",

author = "Annelie Schmittel and Jimmy Sanderson",

year = "2015",

month = aug,

day = "16",

doi = "10.1177/0193723514557821",

language = "English",

volume = "39",

pages = "332--345",

journal = "Journal of Sport & Social Issues",

issn = "0193-7235",

number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Talking About Trayvon in 140 Characters

T2 - Exploring NFL Players’ Tweets About the George Zimmerman Verdict

AU - Schmittel, Annelie

AU - Sanderson, Jimmy

PY - 2015/8/16

Y1 - 2015/8/16

N2 - This research explored how National Football League (NFL) players used Twitter to discuss the verdict in the George Zimmerman murder trial in the immediate aftermath of its announcement. A textual analysis, using constant comparative procedures of 465 tweets from 125 NFL players, was conducted. Results revealed that players discussed the case in the following ways: (a) anticipation, (b) disbelief, (c) critiques of the American Justice System, (d) social commentary, (e) condolences and support, (f) responding to fans, and (g) freedom of speech arguments. The results suggest that Twitter is a viable mechanism for African American and other minority athletes to engage in activism and initiate important conversations about social justice issues. Although empowering, this also may create conflict for team personnel and fans who may be uncomfortable with athletes using Twitter to question structures that favor Whiteness.

AB - This research explored how National Football League (NFL) players used Twitter to discuss the verdict in the George Zimmerman murder trial in the immediate aftermath of its announcement. A textual analysis, using constant comparative procedures of 465 tweets from 125 NFL players, was conducted. Results revealed that players discussed the case in the following ways: (a) anticipation, (b) disbelief, (c) critiques of the American Justice System, (d) social commentary, (e) condolences and support, (f) responding to fans, and (g) freedom of speech arguments. The results suggest that Twitter is a viable mechanism for African American and other minority athletes to engage in activism and initiate important conversations about social justice issues. Although empowering, this also may create conflict for team personnel and fans who may be uncomfortable with athletes using Twitter to question structures that favor Whiteness.

KW - activism

KW - identity

KW - race and sport

KW - social justice

KW - sport and Twitter

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84937042296&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0193723514557821

DO - 10.1177/0193723514557821

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84937042296

VL - 39

SP - 332

EP - 345

JO - Journal of Sport & Social Issues

JF - Journal of Sport & Social Issues

SN - 0193-7235

IS - 4

ER -