Sport psychology and performance meta-analyses: A systematic review of the literature

Marc Lochbaum, Elisabeth Stoner, Tristen Hefner, Sydney Cooper, Andrew M. Lane, Peter C. Terry

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

Sport psychology as an academic pursuit is nearly two centuries old. An enduring goal since inception has been to understand how psychological techniques can improve athletic performance. Although much evidence exists in the form of meta-analytic reviews related to sport psychology and performance, a systematic review of these meta-analyses is absent from the literature. We aimed to synthesize the extant literature to gain insights into the overall impact of sport psychology on athletic performance. Guided by the PRISMA statement for systematic reviews, we reviewed relevant articles identified via the EBSCOhost interface. Thirty meta-analyses published between 1983 and 2021 met the inclusion criteria, covering 16 distinct sport psychology constructs. Overall, sport psychology interventions/variables hypothesized to enhance performance (e.g., cohesion, confidence, mindfulness) were shown to have a moderate beneficial effect (d = 0.51), whereas variables hypothesized to be detrimental to performance (e.g., cognitive anxiety, depression, ego climate) had a small negative effect (d = -0.21). The quality rating of meta-analyses did not significantly moderate the magnitude of observed effects, nor did the research design (i.e., intervention vs. correlation) of the primary studies included in the meta-analyses. Our review strengthens the evidence base for sport psychology techniques and may be of great practical value to practitioners. We provide recommendations for future research in the area.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere0263408
JournalPloS one
Volume17
Issue number2 February
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2022

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Sport psychology and performance meta-analyses: A systematic review of the literature'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this