TY - JOUR
T1 - Seed bank potential of moist-soil managed wetlands in east-central Texas
AU - Collins, Daniel P.
AU - Conway, Warren C.
AU - Mason, Corey D.
AU - Gunnels, Jeffrey W.
N1 - Funding Information:
Acknowledgments Financial and logistical support for this research was provided by the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department and the Arthur Temple College of Forestry and Agriculture (MacIntire-Stennis) at Stephen F. Austin State University. We thank Eric Woolverton, Edwin Bowman, Gary Rhodes, Kevin Kraai, and Matt Symmank for field and logistical support. We appreciate comments by C. Comer, B. Oswald, D. Scognamillo, G. Esslinger, and B. Howe on earlier drafts of this manuscript.
PY - 2013/10
Y1 - 2013/10
N2 - Proper management techniques on moist-soil wetlands provide methods for enhancement of established wetlands, restoration of former wetlands, and creation of new wetland habitat. These techniques also create suitable wetland habitat for non-breeding waterfowl and other wetland dependent species during winter. To understand moist-soil managed wetland vegetative patterns, aspects such as plant species distribution, reproductive strategy, seed bank composition and viability should be thoroughly characterized. We investigated soil seed bank potential of moist-soil managed wetlands on Richland Creek Wildlife Management Area, Texas to determine which treatment (i.e., drawdown or flooded) produced the most desirable moist-soil plants. A total of 27 species germinated, producing 3,731 and 3,031 seedlings in drawdown and flooded treatments, respectively. There were also differences in stem densities between treatments of desirable and non-desirable species. Drawdown treatments had more seedlings germinate than flooded treatments, validating the notion that drawdown treatments provide favorable conditions for seed germination. Drawdown and flooding techniques, when properly timed, will allow managers to drive and directly influence managed wetland plant communities based on seed bank composition and response to presence or absence of water during the germination period.
AB - Proper management techniques on moist-soil wetlands provide methods for enhancement of established wetlands, restoration of former wetlands, and creation of new wetland habitat. These techniques also create suitable wetland habitat for non-breeding waterfowl and other wetland dependent species during winter. To understand moist-soil managed wetland vegetative patterns, aspects such as plant species distribution, reproductive strategy, seed bank composition and viability should be thoroughly characterized. We investigated soil seed bank potential of moist-soil managed wetlands on Richland Creek Wildlife Management Area, Texas to determine which treatment (i.e., drawdown or flooded) produced the most desirable moist-soil plants. A total of 27 species germinated, producing 3,731 and 3,031 seedlings in drawdown and flooded treatments, respectively. There were also differences in stem densities between treatments of desirable and non-desirable species. Drawdown treatments had more seedlings germinate than flooded treatments, validating the notion that drawdown treatments provide favorable conditions for seed germination. Drawdown and flooding techniques, when properly timed, will allow managers to drive and directly influence managed wetland plant communities based on seed bank composition and response to presence or absence of water during the germination period.
KW - Desirable and non-desirable plant species
KW - Moist-soil managed wetlands
KW - Seed bank potential
KW - Texas
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84884818688&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s11273-013-9307-5
DO - 10.1007/s11273-013-9307-5
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84884818688
SN - 0923-4861
VL - 21
SP - 353
EP - 366
JO - Wetlands Ecology and Management
JF - Wetlands Ecology and Management
IS - 5
ER -