TY - GEN
T1 - Screening of the EOR potential of a wolfcamp shale oil reservoir
AU - Sheng, J. J.
AU - Cook, T.
AU - Barnes, W.
AU - Mody, F.
AU - Watson, M.
AU - Porter, M.
AU - Viswanathan, H.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright 2015 ARMA, American Rock Mechanics Association.
PY - 2015
Y1 - 2015
N2 - The current technique to produce shale oil is through primary depletion using horizontal wells with multiple transverse fractures. The oil recovery in oil-bearing shale reservoirs may be less than 10%, which leaves a large percentage of the oil unrecoverable without enhanced oil recovery methods. However, there is no EOR method tested or implemented in shale oil reservoirs. Before testing an EOR method, feasible methods need to be screened. In this paper a screen study was first conducted to analyze the feasibility of every EOR method for a Wolfcamp shale oil reservoir. Actual reservoir and fluid data, and field operational parameters were used. The study shows that water injection and gas injection are most feasible EOR methods. After that, a detailed simulation study was carried out to evaluate the potentials of water and gas injection. The model was calibrated with the actual reservoir performance data. Waterflooding, cyclic water injection, gas flooding and cyclic gas injection were evaluated. The results show that cyclic gas injection provides the highest EOR potential for this reservoir. Simulation results indicate that the oil recovery factor can be increased more than one time by gas injection. This study provides a justification for a possible field implementation in the shale reservoir. It also provides a guide for the EOR screening in shale oil reservoirs.
AB - The current technique to produce shale oil is through primary depletion using horizontal wells with multiple transverse fractures. The oil recovery in oil-bearing shale reservoirs may be less than 10%, which leaves a large percentage of the oil unrecoverable without enhanced oil recovery methods. However, there is no EOR method tested or implemented in shale oil reservoirs. Before testing an EOR method, feasible methods need to be screened. In this paper a screen study was first conducted to analyze the feasibility of every EOR method for a Wolfcamp shale oil reservoir. Actual reservoir and fluid data, and field operational parameters were used. The study shows that water injection and gas injection are most feasible EOR methods. After that, a detailed simulation study was carried out to evaluate the potentials of water and gas injection. The model was calibrated with the actual reservoir performance data. Waterflooding, cyclic water injection, gas flooding and cyclic gas injection were evaluated. The results show that cyclic gas injection provides the highest EOR potential for this reservoir. Simulation results indicate that the oil recovery factor can be increased more than one time by gas injection. This study provides a justification for a possible field implementation in the shale reservoir. It also provides a guide for the EOR screening in shale oil reservoirs.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84964930485&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:84964930485
T3 - 49th US Rock Mechanics / Geomechanics Symposium 2015
SP - 873
EP - 877
BT - 49th US Rock Mechanics / Geomechanics Symposium 2015
PB - American Rock Mechanics Association (ARMA)
T2 - 49th US Rock Mechanics / Geomechanics Symposium
Y2 - 29 June 2015 through 1 July 2015
ER -