Response to: Sufficiently entangled polymers do show shear strain localization at high enough Weissenberg numbers"

Yanfei Li; Miao Hu; Gregory B. McKenna; Christopher J. Dimitriou; Gareth H. McKinley; Rebecca M. Mick; David C. Venerus; Lynden A. Archer

doi:10.1122/1.4884364

Response to: Sufficiently entangled polymers do show shear strain localization at high enough Weissenberg numbers"

Yanfei Li, Miao Hu, Gregory B. McKenna, Christopher J. Dimitriou, Gareth H. McKinley, Rebecca M. Mick, David C. Venerus, Lynden A. Archer

Chemical Engineering

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

21 Scopus citations

Abstract

In response to the Letter Wang et al. (2014) challenging the results of Li et al. (2013), the present letter addresses the specific concerns in the order that they are raised. (1) Whether the material properties (molecular weight, concentration, and polydispersity index) of the samples used in [Li et al. (2013)] agree with Table I in the same paper? (2) What is the true shear banding phase diagram, if any? (3) Are the shear cessation tests carried out by Li et al. (2013) in the regime where nonquiescent relaxation is expected? (4) How to minimize edge effects? (5) How would other factors, such as location of particle tracking velocimetry observation, plastic film on meniscus, misalignment, and surface treatment, affect the velocity profiles?

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	1071-1082
Number of pages	12
Journal	Journal of Rheology
Volume	58
Issue number	4
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1122/1.4884364
State	Published - Jul 2014

Access to Document

10.1122/1.4884364

Cite this

@article{88b3fa28e3f14e1dacb3697e799c5297,

title = "Response to: Sufficiently entangled polymers do show shear strain localization at high enough Weissenberg numbers{"}",

abstract = "In response to the Letter Wang et al. (2014) challenging the results of Li et al. (2013), the present letter addresses the specific concerns in the order that they are raised. (1) Whether the material properties (molecular weight, concentration, and polydispersity index) of the samples used in [Li et al. (2013)] agree with Table I in the same paper? (2) What is the true shear banding phase diagram, if any? (3) Are the shear cessation tests carried out by Li et al. (2013) in the regime where nonquiescent relaxation is expected? (4) How to minimize edge effects? (5) How would other factors, such as location of particle tracking velocimetry observation, plastic film on meniscus, misalignment, and surface treatment, affect the velocity profiles?",

author = "Yanfei Li and Miao Hu and McKenna, {Gregory B.} and Dimitriou, {Christopher J.} and McKinley, {Gareth H.} and Mick, {Rebecca M.} and Venerus, {David C.} and Archer, {Lynden A.}",

year = "2014",

month = jul,

doi = "10.1122/1.4884364",

language = "English",

volume = "58",

pages = "1071--1082",

journal = "Journal of Rheology",

issn = "0148-6055",

number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Response to

T2 - Sufficiently entangled polymers do show shear strain localization at high enough Weissenberg numbers"

AU - Li, Yanfei

AU - Hu, Miao

AU - McKenna, Gregory B.

AU - Dimitriou, Christopher J.

AU - McKinley, Gareth H.

AU - Mick, Rebecca M.

AU - Venerus, David C.

AU - Archer, Lynden A.

PY - 2014/7

Y1 - 2014/7

N2 - In response to the Letter Wang et al. (2014) challenging the results of Li et al. (2013), the present letter addresses the specific concerns in the order that they are raised. (1) Whether the material properties (molecular weight, concentration, and polydispersity index) of the samples used in [Li et al. (2013)] agree with Table I in the same paper? (2) What is the true shear banding phase diagram, if any? (3) Are the shear cessation tests carried out by Li et al. (2013) in the regime where nonquiescent relaxation is expected? (4) How to minimize edge effects? (5) How would other factors, such as location of particle tracking velocimetry observation, plastic film on meniscus, misalignment, and surface treatment, affect the velocity profiles?

AB - In response to the Letter Wang et al. (2014) challenging the results of Li et al. (2013), the present letter addresses the specific concerns in the order that they are raised. (1) Whether the material properties (molecular weight, concentration, and polydispersity index) of the samples used in [Li et al. (2013)] agree with Table I in the same paper? (2) What is the true shear banding phase diagram, if any? (3) Are the shear cessation tests carried out by Li et al. (2013) in the regime where nonquiescent relaxation is expected? (4) How to minimize edge effects? (5) How would other factors, such as location of particle tracking velocimetry observation, plastic film on meniscus, misalignment, and surface treatment, affect the velocity profiles?

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84903696555&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1122/1.4884364

DO - 10.1122/1.4884364

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84903696555

SN - 0148-6055

VL - 58

SP - 1071

EP - 1082

JO - Journal of Rheology

JF - Journal of Rheology

IS - 4

ER -

Response to: Sufficiently entangled polymers do show shear strain localization at high enough Weissenberg numbers"

Abstract

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this