TY - JOUR
T1 - Response Selection Contributes to the Preparation Cost for Bimanual Asymmetric Movements
AU - Blinch, Jarrod
AU - Franks, Ian M.
AU - Carpenter, Mark G.
AU - Chua, Romeo
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors thank Professor Robert L. Sainburg and an anonymous reviewer for their insightful critiques. The Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada supported this research with a discovery grant awarded to Romeo Chua.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2017, Copyright © Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
PY - 2018/7/4
Y1 - 2018/7/4
N2 - Movement preparation of bimanual asymmetric movements takes more time than bimanual symmetric movements in choice reaction-time conditions. This bimanual asymmetric cost may be caused by increased processing demands on any stage of movement preparation. The authors tested the contributions of each stage of movement preparation to the asymmetric cost by using the additive factors method. This involved altering the stimulus contrast, response compatibility, and response complexity. These manipulations changed the processing demands on stimulus identification, response selection, and response programming, respectively. Any manipulation with a larger reaction time cost than control suggests that stage contributes to the bimanual asymmetric cost. The bimanual asymmetric cost was larger for incompatible stimuli, which supports that response selection contributes to the bimanual asymmetric cost.
AB - Movement preparation of bimanual asymmetric movements takes more time than bimanual symmetric movements in choice reaction-time conditions. This bimanual asymmetric cost may be caused by increased processing demands on any stage of movement preparation. The authors tested the contributions of each stage of movement preparation to the asymmetric cost by using the additive factors method. This involved altering the stimulus contrast, response compatibility, and response complexity. These manipulations changed the processing demands on stimulus identification, response selection, and response programming, respectively. Any manipulation with a larger reaction time cost than control suggests that stage contributes to the bimanual asymmetric cost. The bimanual asymmetric cost was larger for incompatible stimuli, which supports that response selection contributes to the bimanual asymmetric cost.
KW - additive factors method
KW - bimanual reaching movements
KW - direct cues
KW - information processing
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85029419888&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/00222895.2017.1363699
DO - 10.1080/00222895.2017.1363699
M3 - Comment/debate
C2 - 28876201
AN - SCOPUS:85029419888
SN - 0022-2895
VL - 50
SP - 392
EP - 397
JO - Journal of Motor Behavior
JF - Journal of Motor Behavior
IS - 4
ER -