Abstract
Deligönül and Çavuşgil (1997) conduct a paradigm-level analysis of resource-advantage (R-A) theory. They argue that (1) Hunt and Morgan (1995) offer resource-advantage theory as a replacement for perfect competition theory, (2) a successful challenger to any theory must come from a new paradigm, (3) but both perfect competition and R-A theory come from the same paradigm. Therefore, (4) the replacement thesis is dubious. We evaluate their argument.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 74-82 |
Number of pages | 9 |
Journal | Journal of Marketing |
Volume | 61 |
Issue number | 4 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Oct 1997 |