TY - JOUR
T1 - Remaining useful life estimation based on detection of explosive changes
T2 - Analysis of bearing vibration
AU - Barraza-Barraza, Diana
AU - Tercero-Gómez, Víctor G.
AU - Eduardo Cordero-Franco, A.
AU - Beruvides, Mario G.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020, Prognostics and Health Management Society. All rights reserved.
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - The monitoring of condition variables for maintenance purposes is a growing trend amongst researchers and practition-ers where decisions are based on degradation levels. The two approaches in Condition-Based Maintenance (CBM) are di-agnosing the level of degradation (diagnostics) or predicting when a certain level of degradation will be reached (prognos-tics). Using diagnostics determines when it is necessary to perform maintenance, but it rarely allows for estimation of future degradation. In the second case, prognostics does al-low for degradation and failure prediction, however, its major drawback lies in when to perform the analysis, and exactly what information should be used for predictions. This en-cumbrance is due to previous studies that have shown that degradation variable could undergo a change that misleads these calculations. This paper addresses the issue of identifying explosive changes in condition variables, using Control Charts, to determine when to perform a new model fitting in order to obtain more accurate Remaining Useful Life (RUL) estimations. The diagnostic-prognostic methodology allows for discarding pre-change observations to avoid contamina-tion in condition prediction. In addition the performance of the integration methodology is compared against adaptive au-toregressive (AR) models. Results show that using only the observations acquired after the out-of-control signal produces more accurate RUL estimations.
AB - The monitoring of condition variables for maintenance purposes is a growing trend amongst researchers and practition-ers where decisions are based on degradation levels. The two approaches in Condition-Based Maintenance (CBM) are di-agnosing the level of degradation (diagnostics) or predicting when a certain level of degradation will be reached (prognos-tics). Using diagnostics determines when it is necessary to perform maintenance, but it rarely allows for estimation of future degradation. In the second case, prognostics does al-low for degradation and failure prediction, however, its major drawback lies in when to perform the analysis, and exactly what information should be used for predictions. This en-cumbrance is due to previous studies that have shown that degradation variable could undergo a change that misleads these calculations. This paper addresses the issue of identifying explosive changes in condition variables, using Control Charts, to determine when to perform a new model fitting in order to obtain more accurate Remaining Useful Life (RUL) estimations. The diagnostic-prognostic methodology allows for discarding pre-change observations to avoid contamina-tion in condition prediction. In addition the performance of the integration methodology is compared against adaptive au-toregressive (AR) models. Results show that using only the observations acquired after the out-of-control signal produces more accurate RUL estimations.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85092199138&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85092199138
SN - 2153-2648
VL - 11
SP - 1
EP - 16
JO - International Journal of Prognostics and Health Management
JF - International Journal of Prognostics and Health Management
M1 - 009
ER -