Relationship between Computer-Based Reading Activities and Reading Achievements among Hong Kong and U.S. Students: A Comparative Study Using PIRLS 2011 Data

Dan Li, Jian Wang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Reading for personal interest and acquiring and using information using various reading processes are important parts of reading literacy that students need to develop in order to progress successfully through their schooling and fully function in the information society. Computer assisted reading instructional activities are assumed useful in improving the reading literacy of students, especially reading processes. However, students in Hong Kong and the US demonstrated a substantial performance gap in reading proficiency. Using the data from Progress in International Reading Literacy (PIRLS) 2011, this study examines whether and to what extent four computer-based reading instructional activities influence students' performance in reading processes central to reading for interest and acquiring and using information in Hong Kong and the US. It found that computer-based reading activities are associated with students' literacy performance in different ways in the two places. In particular, the more often Hong Kong students used the computer to read, the lower the reading achievement in all reading processes measured. However, in the US context, using the computer to write is positively associated with students' reading scores in all reading processes while using software is negatively related to their reading performance in using all the reading processes.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)552-576
Number of pages25
JournalFrontiers of Education in China
Volume9
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 20 2014

Keywords

  • comparative study
  • computer-based reading activities
  • reading achievement

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Relationship between Computer-Based Reading Activities and Reading Achievements among Hong Kong and U.S. Students: A Comparative Study Using PIRLS 2011 Data'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this