TY - JOUR
T1 - Preparing digitized cervigrams for colposcopy research and education
T2 - Determination of optimal resolution and compression parameters
AU - Jeronimo, Jose
AU - Long, Rodney
AU - Neve, Leif
AU - Ferris, Daron
AU - Noller, Kenneth
AU - Spitzer, Mark
AU - Mitra, Sunanda
AU - Guo, Jiangling
AU - Nutter, Brian
AU - Castle, Phil
AU - Herrero, Rolando
AU - Rodriguez, Ana Cecilia
AU - Schiffman, Mark
PY - 2006/1
Y1 - 2006/1
N2 - OBJECTIVE: Visual assessment of digitized cervigrams through the Internet needs to be optimized. The National Cancer Institute and National Library of Medicine are involved in a large effort to improve colposcopic assessment and, in preparation, are conducting methodologic research. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We selected 50 cervigrams with diagnoses ranging from normal to cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 3 or invasive cancer. Those pictures were scanned at 5 resolution levels from 1,550 to 4,000 dots per inch (dpi) and were presented to 4 expert colposcopists to assess image quality. After the ideal resolution level was determined, pictures were compressed at 7 compression ratios from 20:1 to 80:1 to determine the optimal level of compression that permitted full assessment of key visual details. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences between the 3,000 and 4,000 dpi pictures. At 2,000 dpi resolution, only one colposcopist found a slightly statistically significant difference (p = 0.02) compared with the gold standard. There was a clear loss of quality of the pictures at 1,660 dpi. At compression ratio 60:1, 3 of 4 evaluators found statistically significant differences when comparing against the gold standard. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that 2,000 dpi is the optimal level for digitizing cervigrams, and the optimal compression ratio is 50:1 using a novel wavelet-based technology. At these parameters, pictures have no significant differences with the gold standard.
AB - OBJECTIVE: Visual assessment of digitized cervigrams through the Internet needs to be optimized. The National Cancer Institute and National Library of Medicine are involved in a large effort to improve colposcopic assessment and, in preparation, are conducting methodologic research. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We selected 50 cervigrams with diagnoses ranging from normal to cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 3 or invasive cancer. Those pictures were scanned at 5 resolution levels from 1,550 to 4,000 dots per inch (dpi) and were presented to 4 expert colposcopists to assess image quality. After the ideal resolution level was determined, pictures were compressed at 7 compression ratios from 20:1 to 80:1 to determine the optimal level of compression that permitted full assessment of key visual details. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences between the 3,000 and 4,000 dpi pictures. At 2,000 dpi resolution, only one colposcopist found a slightly statistically significant difference (p = 0.02) compared with the gold standard. There was a clear loss of quality of the pictures at 1,660 dpi. At compression ratio 60:1, 3 of 4 evaluators found statistically significant differences when comparing against the gold standard. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that 2,000 dpi is the optimal level for digitizing cervigrams, and the optimal compression ratio is 50:1 using a novel wavelet-based technology. At these parameters, pictures have no significant differences with the gold standard.
KW - Cervical cancer
KW - Cervigram
KW - Colposcopy
KW - Compression
KW - Digitization
KW - Scanning
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33645639709&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/01.lgt.0000192696.93172.ae
DO - 10.1097/01.lgt.0000192696.93172.ae
M3 - Article
C2 - 16378030
AN - SCOPUS:33645639709
SN - 1089-2591
VL - 10
SP - 39
EP - 44
JO - Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease
JF - Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease
IS - 1
ER -