Abstract
Conventional monetary theory suggests that a closed system banking regime may lead to in-concert over-expansions of circulation by its banks. However, Selgin (2001, 2010) argues that this is unlikely as long as there are enough banks to ensure (i) routine interbank settlement and (ii) no collusion amongst banks refraining from redeeming one another’s notes. Banks effectively form a “chain gang” where in-concert expansion requires coordination that is prohibitively costly in a system with many banks. In order to test this conjecture, we examine state-level data on circulations and reserves from the Suffolk Banking System (1825 to 1858) in New England. In addition to narrative evidence on the stability of the Suffolk, panel cointegration techniques suggest that circulations and reserves from the Suffolk are cointegrated. Furthermore, the estimated error-correction mechanism of state-level circulations to the Suffolk’s reserves implies a deviation half-life of only about one year. We int
Original language | English |
---|---|
Journal | Journal of Macroeconomics |
State | Published - Sep 2013 |