Oxygen toxicity, biological defense systems and immunity historical perspective

C. R. Kang, S. Sweetser, L. M. Boylan, J. E. Spallholz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

10 Scopus citations

Abstract

Oxygen, the diradical byproduct of photosynthesis from algae and plants, made possible the emergence of aerobic life beginning about 4 billion years ago. Along with the evolution of aerobic life processes came the consequence of oxygen toxicity and the necessity of the development of an antioxidant defense system by aerobic prokaryotes. Eukaryotes, both by inheriting and hproving upon the first prokaryote defenses against the toxic reactive oxygen intermediate species (ROIs), have developed a multiplicity of ROI defense systems consisting of dietary nutrients and endogenously synthesized molecules ranging from the simple to the more complex enzymes, as in the nearly universal distribution of superoxide dismutase. Multicellular animal species have even used the toxic properties of oxygen in the evolution of their own defense systems against xenobiotic intruders in the respiratory burst of the cellular immune system. This historical account traces the discoveries and events of the free radical theory of oxygen toxicity first espoused by Rebecca Gerschman in 1954 and later confirmed by Irwin Fridovich with the confiiation of discovery of superoxide (O2)n d superoxide dismutase in 1969. Along with these discoveries and the continuing refinement of the experimental data that continues to support the theoretical basis of the free radical theory, has come the realization that cancer and life’s other degenerative diseases, including the aging process itself, may also be a consequence of an aerobic existence.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)51-84
Number of pages34
JournalJournal of Nutritional Immunology
Volume3
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 30 1994

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Oxygen toxicity, biological defense systems and immunity historical perspective'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this