TY - GEN
T1 - Optimizing seat and ball combination of actual gas lift valve
T2 - SPE Artificial Lift Conference and Exhibition - Americas 2020, ALCE 2020
AU - Kabir, Ehsanul
AU - Emadi, Hossein
AU - McElroy, Phillip
AU - Elldakli, Fathi
AU - Young, Matt
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Society of Petroleum Engineers - SPE Artificial Lift Conference and Exhibition - Americas 2020, ALCE 2020. All rights reserved.
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - In this paper, comprehensive experimental and simulation studies were conducted to determine the optimum combination of seat and ball for actual gas lift valve (GLV). The experiments were run for multiple ball and seat sizes to cover the whole gamut of industrially used GLVs. A numerical model, built based on computational fluid dynamics (CFD), was validated first using experimental results. The difference between experimental and simulation runs for multiple cases was found to be maximum 5%. Finally, results from both simulations and experiments were utilized to determine the optimum seat and ball geometries. From the actual GLV experiments and the simulations, it was concluded that the optimum port top diameter (PTD) of the seat is 2/16-inch larger than the port bottom diameter (PBD) when used in combination with a ball that is 1/16-inch larger in dimeter than the PBD. It was also concluded that, with the aforementioned optimum combination of the ball and the seat, the entirely beveled seats perform better than both the partially beveled seats and the sharp edge seats. This optimum combination of the ball and the seat resulted in a GLV gas throughput improvement of more than 27% over the currently used design in the industry for 5/16-inch port seat. For larger port seats, this improvement is expected to be even greater.
AB - In this paper, comprehensive experimental and simulation studies were conducted to determine the optimum combination of seat and ball for actual gas lift valve (GLV). The experiments were run for multiple ball and seat sizes to cover the whole gamut of industrially used GLVs. A numerical model, built based on computational fluid dynamics (CFD), was validated first using experimental results. The difference between experimental and simulation runs for multiple cases was found to be maximum 5%. Finally, results from both simulations and experiments were utilized to determine the optimum seat and ball geometries. From the actual GLV experiments and the simulations, it was concluded that the optimum port top diameter (PTD) of the seat is 2/16-inch larger than the port bottom diameter (PBD) when used in combination with a ball that is 1/16-inch larger in dimeter than the PBD. It was also concluded that, with the aforementioned optimum combination of the ball and the seat, the entirely beveled seats perform better than both the partially beveled seats and the sharp edge seats. This optimum combination of the ball and the seat resulted in a GLV gas throughput improvement of more than 27% over the currently used design in the industry for 5/16-inch port seat. For larger port seats, this improvement is expected to be even greater.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85097551198&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85097551198
T3 - Society of Petroleum Engineers - SPE Artificial Lift Conference and Exhibition - Americas 2020, ALCE 2020
BT - Society of Petroleum Engineers - SPE Artificial Lift Conference and Exhibition - Americas 2020, ALCE 2020
PB - Society of Petroleum Engineers
Y2 - 10 November 2020 through 12 November 2020
ER -