TY - JOUR
T1 - On multiple fields. Between the material world and media
T2 - Two cases from the Peloponnesus, Greece
AU - Witmore, Christopher L.
PY - 2004/12
Y1 - 2004/12
N2 - Deeply embedded in much of archaeological thought is an epistemological scheme of the 'field' as separate from the 'home-base', whether laboratory, archive or study. This modernist division is inadequate, for it fails to account for the interconnected and nonlinear process of archaeological knowledge construction. Taking direction from science studies and specifically from the work of Bruno Latour, this article sketches a model of multiple fields, which may serve as an alternative to this divide. Through the effective juxtaposition of two case studies from the Greek Peloponnesus, it explores two disparate yet complementary cases of how multiple fields make up the epistemological terrain of archaeology. The first case study traces the strains of an early 19th-century web, which situates the process of knowledge production at that time, while the second focuses on the archaeological process by closely following the transformation of things into documents during a regional survey. By recasting and multiplying the 'field' in archaeology we move from an oversimplified and bounded modernist scheme to one that allows for the complexities of archaeological practices which involve the action of instruments, media and human beings.
AB - Deeply embedded in much of archaeological thought is an epistemological scheme of the 'field' as separate from the 'home-base', whether laboratory, archive or study. This modernist division is inadequate, for it fails to account for the interconnected and nonlinear process of archaeological knowledge construction. Taking direction from science studies and specifically from the work of Bruno Latour, this article sketches a model of multiple fields, which may serve as an alternative to this divide. Through the effective juxtaposition of two case studies from the Greek Peloponnesus, it explores two disparate yet complementary cases of how multiple fields make up the epistemological terrain of archaeology. The first case study traces the strains of an early 19th-century web, which situates the process of knowledge production at that time, while the second focuses on the archaeological process by closely following the transformation of things into documents during a regional survey. By recasting and multiplying the 'field' in archaeology we move from an oversimplified and bounded modernist scheme to one that allows for the complexities of archaeological practices which involve the action of instruments, media and human beings.
KW - Material world
KW - Media
KW - Multiple fields
KW - Practice
KW - The Argolid Exploration Project
KW - William Martin Leake
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=17244382367&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1017/S1380203805001479
DO - 10.1017/S1380203805001479
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:17244382367
SN - 1380-2038
VL - 11
SP - 133
EP - 164
JO - Archaeological Dialogues
JF - Archaeological Dialogues
IS - 2
ER -