OMG GMO! Parent-Child Conversations about Genetically-modified foods.

Andrew Shtulman, I. Share, R. Silber-Marker, Asheley Landrum

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Studies indicate that Genetically Modified Organisms, or GMOs, are safe to consume, but many adults remain skeptical. What kind of input are children receiving about GMOs? And how does that input shape their understanding of what GMOs are? We investigated this question in the context of parent-child conversations about food product decisions. Seventy parent-child dyads were shown a series of food product pairings and asked to discuss their preferences. The products differed by whether they were made from GMOs, as well as whether they contained gluten and whether they were grown organically. Non-GM foods were preferred over gluten-free foods, and conversations about GM foods contained more moral language than conversations about gluten. Preferences for organic foods equaled preferences for non-GM foods, and conversations about organic foods were as morally charged, but parents were less knowledgeable about the meaning of GMO than they were about the meaning of organic. Ch
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)13
JournalCognitive Development
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2020

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'OMG GMO! Parent-Child Conversations about Genetically-modified foods.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this