TY - GEN
T1 - Modeling factors influencing culvert load ratings
T2 - Geotechnical Frontiers 2017
AU - Wood, Timothy A.
AU - Surles, James G.
AU - Mousavi, S. Mehdi
AU - Jayawickrama, Priyantha W.
AU - Javid, Amir Hossein
AU - Seo, Hoyoung
AU - Lawson, William D.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© ASCE.
PY - 2017
Y1 - 2017
N2 - This parametric analysis illustrates the relative influence of six parameters on reinforced concrete box culvert (RCBC) load rating using a production-simplified soil-structure interaction demand model. Frequently, field inspections show in-service RCBCs to perform adequately, but load rating per AASHTO guidance requires load posting. Parameters such as (1) the culvert design, (2) cover soil depth, and (3) soil stiffness are driven by the in-service culvert condition. The test matrix consists of three RCBC designs evaluated under three cover soil depths embedded in three soil stiffnesses. Load raters may implement less conservative, more accurate assumptions for (4) pavement stiffness, (5) effective moment of inertia, and (6) the top interior wall fixity, as appropriate. Cover soil depth and design showed significant impact on the culvert load rating, but are defined by the culvert condition. Less conservative assumptions for the effective moment of inertia had the greatest impact on the load rating, followed by the inclusion of pavement stiffness.
AB - This parametric analysis illustrates the relative influence of six parameters on reinforced concrete box culvert (RCBC) load rating using a production-simplified soil-structure interaction demand model. Frequently, field inspections show in-service RCBCs to perform adequately, but load rating per AASHTO guidance requires load posting. Parameters such as (1) the culvert design, (2) cover soil depth, and (3) soil stiffness are driven by the in-service culvert condition. The test matrix consists of three RCBC designs evaluated under three cover soil depths embedded in three soil stiffnesses. Load raters may implement less conservative, more accurate assumptions for (4) pavement stiffness, (5) effective moment of inertia, and (6) the top interior wall fixity, as appropriate. Cover soil depth and design showed significant impact on the culvert load rating, but are defined by the culvert condition. Less conservative assumptions for the effective moment of inertia had the greatest impact on the load rating, followed by the inclusion of pavement stiffness.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85018735502&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1061/9780784480441.026
DO - 10.1061/9780784480441.026
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85018735502
T3 - Geotechnical Special Publication
SP - 243
EP - 252
BT - Geotechnical Special Publication
A2 - Brandon, Thomas L.
A2 - Valentine, Richard J.
PB - American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)
Y2 - 12 March 2017 through 15 March 2017
ER -