Metacomprehension judgments reflect the belief that diagrams improve learning from text

Michael Serra, John Dunlosky

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


In two experiments we systematically explored whether people consider the format of text materials when judging their text learning, and whether doing so might inappropriately bias their judgements. Participants studied either text with diagrams (multimedia) or text alone and made both per-paragraph judgements and global judgements of their text learning. In Experiment 1 they judged their learning to be better for text with diagrams than for text alone. In that study, however, test performance was greater for multimedia, so the judgements may reflect either a belief in the power of multimedia or on-line processing. Experiment 2 replicated this finding and also included a third group that read texts with pictures that did not improve text performance. Judgements made by this group were just as high as those made by participants who received the effective multimedia format. These results confirm the hypothesis that people’s metacomprehension judgements can be influenced by their beliefs
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)698-711
StatePublished - Oct 2010


Dive into the research topics of 'Metacomprehension judgments reflect the belief that diagrams improve learning from text'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this