TY - JOUR
T1 - Listening to students
T2 - A usability evaluation of instructor commentary
AU - Still, Brian
AU - Koerber, Amy
PY - 2010/4
Y1 - 2010/4
N2 - Many students see instructor commentary as not constructive but prescriptive directions that must be followed so that their grade, not necessarily their writing, can be improved. Research offering heuristics for improving such commentary is available for guidance, but the methods employed to comment on writing still have not changed significantly, primarily because we lack sufficient understanding of how students use feedback. Usability evaluation is ideally equipped for assessing how students use commentary and how instructors might adapt their comments to make them more usable. This article reports on usability testing of commentary provided to students in an introductory technical writing course.
AB - Many students see instructor commentary as not constructive but prescriptive directions that must be followed so that their grade, not necessarily their writing, can be improved. Research offering heuristics for improving such commentary is available for guidance, but the methods employed to comment on writing still have not changed significantly, primarily because we lack sufficient understanding of how students use feedback. Usability evaluation is ideally equipped for assessing how students use commentary and how instructors might adapt their comments to make them more usable. This article reports on usability testing of commentary provided to students in an introductory technical writing course.
KW - Grading
KW - Instructor commentary
KW - Pedagogy
KW - Usability
KW - Writing feedback
KW - Writing instruction
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77951556154&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/1050651909353304
DO - 10.1177/1050651909353304
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:77951556154
SN - 1050-6519
VL - 24
SP - 206
EP - 233
JO - Journal of Business and Technical Communication
JF - Journal of Business and Technical Communication
IS - 2
ER -