TY - JOUR
T1 - Legislative environment and others factors that inhibit transfer of Mexican publicly funded research into commercial ventures
AU - Hernandez-Mondragon, Alma Cristal
AU - Herrera-Estrella, Luis
AU - Kuri-Harcuch, Walid
N1 - Funding Information:
PRCs are entities that fully belong to the Federal Public Administration and they are recognized as PRCs according to The Science and Technology Act, with the purpose of carrying out scientific and technological research. They are also publicly funded institutions and their budget comes directly from the federal government through the National Council of Science and Technology (Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología, Conacyt). These institutions have the privilege of being considered in the Science and Technology Act as a special case for the Federal Law of Administrative Responsibilities of Public Servants. The EFPAs are entities of the Federal Public Administration with R&D activities but in the Law they have different characteristics from HEIs or PRCs.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Elsevier Ltd.
PY - 2016/8/1
Y1 - 2016/8/1
N2 - In this work we explored some factors that limit technology transfer in the process of innovation from different research institutions in Mexico. We found that one of the main inhibitors for technology transfer is the conflict of interest provision in the Federal Law of Administrative Responsibilities of Public Servants. Since most research and development activities are carried out in public institutions, and funding is mainly derived from Federal and State government programs, scientists are considered public servants in the eyes of the Law. Therefore, according to current norms scientists can incur in conflict of interest for technology transfer and commercialization of their research. From the information gathered from this study, we proposed an amendment to the above mentioned Law to eliminate potential conflict of interest, which derives from the participation of scientists from Mexican publicly funded institutions in the creation of spin-off companies, and hence, to incentivize entrepreneurship, technology transfer and innovation to effectively commercialize the products of publicly funded research. We also discovered other inhibitors of technology transfer that are discussed in this paper.
AB - In this work we explored some factors that limit technology transfer in the process of innovation from different research institutions in Mexico. We found that one of the main inhibitors for technology transfer is the conflict of interest provision in the Federal Law of Administrative Responsibilities of Public Servants. Since most research and development activities are carried out in public institutions, and funding is mainly derived from Federal and State government programs, scientists are considered public servants in the eyes of the Law. Therefore, according to current norms scientists can incur in conflict of interest for technology transfer and commercialization of their research. From the information gathered from this study, we proposed an amendment to the above mentioned Law to eliminate potential conflict of interest, which derives from the participation of scientists from Mexican publicly funded institutions in the creation of spin-off companies, and hence, to incentivize entrepreneurship, technology transfer and innovation to effectively commercialize the products of publicly funded research. We also discovered other inhibitors of technology transfer that are discussed in this paper.
KW - Conflict of interest
KW - Entrepreneurship
KW - Innovation
KW - Legislative act
KW - Technology transfer
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84974573798&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.techsoc.2016.03.002
DO - 10.1016/j.techsoc.2016.03.002
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84974573798
SN - 0160-791X
VL - 46
SP - 100
EP - 108
JO - Technology in Society
JF - Technology in Society
ER -