TY - JOUR
T1 - Kinetic and electromyographic subphase characteristics with relation to countermovement vertical jump performance
AU - Harry, John R.
AU - Paquette, Max R.
AU - Schilling, Brian K.
AU - Barker, Leland A.
AU - James, C. Roger
AU - Dufek, Janet S.
N1 - Funding Information:
This project was supported in part by a Graduate Research Grant from the National Strength and Conditioning Association (NSCA) Foundation. The NSCA Foundation did not contribute to the study design; the collection, analysis, and interpretation of the data; the writing of the manuscript; or the decision to publish. The contents of this project are the sole responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the NSCA. The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Human Kinetics, Inc.
PY - 2018/8
Y1 - 2018/8
N2 - This study sought to identify kinetic and electromyographic subphase characteristics distinguishing good from poor jumpers during countermovement vertical jumps (CMVJs), as defined by the reactive strength index (RSI, CMVJ displacement divided by jump time; cutoff = 0.46 m·s-1). A total of 15 men (1.8 [0.6] m, 84.5 [8.5] kg, 24 [2] y) were stratified by RSI into good (n = 6; RSI = 0.57 [0.07] m·s-1) and poor (n = 9; RSI = 0.39 [0.06] m·s-1) performance groups. The following variables were compared between groups using independent t tests (a = .05) and Cohen’s d effect sizes (d = 0.8, large): jump height, propulsive impulse, eccentric rate of force development, and jump time, unloading, eccentric, and concentric subphase times, and average electromyographic amplitudes of 8 lower extremity muscles. Compared with the poor RSI group, the good RSI group exhibited a greater, though not statistically different CMVJ displacement (d = 1.07, P = .06). In addition, the good RSI group exhibited a significantly greater propulsive impulse (P = .04, d = 1.27) and a significantly more rapid unloading subphase (P = .04, d = 1.08). No other significant or noteworthy differences were detected. Enhanced RSI appears related to a quicker unloading phase, allowing a greater portion of the total jumping phase to be utilized generating positive net force. Poor jumpers should aim to use unloading strategies that emphasize quickness to enhance RSI during CMVJ.
AB - This study sought to identify kinetic and electromyographic subphase characteristics distinguishing good from poor jumpers during countermovement vertical jumps (CMVJs), as defined by the reactive strength index (RSI, CMVJ displacement divided by jump time; cutoff = 0.46 m·s-1). A total of 15 men (1.8 [0.6] m, 84.5 [8.5] kg, 24 [2] y) were stratified by RSI into good (n = 6; RSI = 0.57 [0.07] m·s-1) and poor (n = 9; RSI = 0.39 [0.06] m·s-1) performance groups. The following variables were compared between groups using independent t tests (a = .05) and Cohen’s d effect sizes (d = 0.8, large): jump height, propulsive impulse, eccentric rate of force development, and jump time, unloading, eccentric, and concentric subphase times, and average electromyographic amplitudes of 8 lower extremity muscles. Compared with the poor RSI group, the good RSI group exhibited a greater, though not statistically different CMVJ displacement (d = 1.07, P = .06). In addition, the good RSI group exhibited a significantly greater propulsive impulse (P = .04, d = 1.27) and a significantly more rapid unloading subphase (P = .04, d = 1.08). No other significant or noteworthy differences were detected. Enhanced RSI appears related to a quicker unloading phase, allowing a greater portion of the total jumping phase to be utilized generating positive net force. Poor jumpers should aim to use unloading strategies that emphasize quickness to enhance RSI during CMVJ.
KW - Force production
KW - Impulse
KW - Stretch-shortening cycle
KW - Unloading
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85051464744&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1123/jab.2017-0305
DO - 10.1123/jab.2017-0305
M3 - Article
C2 - 29485344
AN - SCOPUS:85051464744
SN - 1065-8483
VL - 34
SP - 291
EP - 297
JO - Journal of Applied Biomechanics
JF - Journal of Applied Biomechanics
IS - 4
ER -