Just part of the game? Arms races, rivalry, and war

Toby J. Rider, Michael G. Findley, Paul F. Diehl

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

25 Scopus citations

Abstract

In this study, we look at the relationship of arms races to war, with appropriate consideration of rivalries. Are arms races more common in rivalries than in lesser competitions? Are they merely a consequence of rivalry competitions? How do the patterns of arms races map with those of war in rivalries? We explore these concerns with an empirical examination of rivalry and non-rivalry populations in the 1816-2000 period. In brief, we find that: arms races occur most frequently in the context of enduring rivalries; arms races are more likely in the middle and later stages of rivalry; the frequency of arms races is higher in rivalries with war than rivalries that do not experience war; and only when arms races occur in the later phases of rivalries is there an increased chance of war. Our study narrows the scope of the arms race-war relationship relative to past studies, demonstrating that the arms race-war relationship is conditional on rivalry processes.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)85-100
Number of pages16
JournalJournal of Peace Research
Volume48
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2011

Keywords

  • Arms races
  • Conflict
  • Heckman selection model
  • Rivalry

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Just part of the game? Arms races, rivalry, and war'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this