Is it "trustworthy"? A multiple-levels-of-analysis reexamination of an ohio state leadership study, with implications for future research

Chester A. Schriesheim; Claudia C. Cogliser; Linda L. Neider

doi:10.1016/1048-9843(95)90031-4

Is it "trustworthy"? A multiple-levels-of-analysis reexamination of an ohio state leadership study, with implications for future research

Chester A. Schriesheim, Claudia C. Cogliser, Linda L. Neider

Business Administration

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article

66 Scopus citations

Abstract

A moderator subgroup study, originally published by Schriesheim and Murphy (1976), is reexamined using the within-group agreement coefficient (r_wg; James, Demaree & Wolf, 1984), moderated raw-score multiple linear regression, and moderated within- and between-entity analysis (WABA; Dansereau, Alutto & Yammarino, 1984; Schriesheim, forthcoming). The results show serious discrepancies in results between the subgroup and regression approaches, the need to exercise care in interpreting the r_wg and raw-score regression results, and the necessity of conducting WABA and supplemental within-entity WABA moderation analyses to gain meaningful insight into the phenomena being investigated. Implications and future directions for leadership theory and research are considered.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	111-145
Number of pages	35
Journal	The Leadership Quarterly
Volume	6
Issue number	2
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/1048-9843(95)90031-4
State	Published - 1995

Access to Document

10.1016/1048-9843(95)90031-4

Link to publication in Scopus

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Is it "trustworthy"? A multiple-levels-of-analysis reexamination of an ohio state leadership study, with implications for future research'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this

Schriesheim, C. A., Cogliser, C. C., & Neider, L. L. (1995). Is it "trustworthy"? A multiple-levels-of-analysis reexamination of an ohio state leadership study, with implications for future research. The Leadership Quarterly, 6(2), 111-145. https://doi.org/10.1016/1048-9843(95)90031-4

@article{f91368ff5fa349c297da98d1c1d60cbf,

title = "Is it {"}trustworthy{"}? A multiple-levels-of-analysis reexamination of an ohio state leadership study, with implications for future research",

abstract = "A moderator subgroup study, originally published by Schriesheim and Murphy (1976), is reexamined using the within-group agreement coefficient (rwg; James, Demaree & Wolf, 1984), moderated raw-score multiple linear regression, and moderated within- and between-entity analysis (WABA; Dansereau, Alutto & Yammarino, 1984; Schriesheim, forthcoming). The results show serious discrepancies in results between the subgroup and regression approaches, the need to exercise care in interpreting the rwg and raw-score regression results, and the necessity of conducting WABA and supplemental within-entity WABA moderation analyses to gain meaningful insight into the phenomena being investigated. Implications and future directions for leadership theory and research are considered.",

author = "Schriesheim, {Chester A.} and Cogliser, {Claudia C.} and Neider, {Linda L.}",

year = "1995",

doi = "10.1016/1048-9843(95)90031-4",

language = "English",

volume = "6",

pages = "111--145",

journal = "Leadership Quarterly",

issn = "1048-9843",

number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Is it "trustworthy"? A multiple-levels-of-analysis reexamination of an ohio state leadership study, with implications for future research

AU - Schriesheim, Chester A.

AU - Cogliser, Claudia C.

AU - Neider, Linda L.

PY - 1995

Y1 - 1995

N2 - A moderator subgroup study, originally published by Schriesheim and Murphy (1976), is reexamined using the within-group agreement coefficient (rwg; James, Demaree & Wolf, 1984), moderated raw-score multiple linear regression, and moderated within- and between-entity analysis (WABA; Dansereau, Alutto & Yammarino, 1984; Schriesheim, forthcoming). The results show serious discrepancies in results between the subgroup and regression approaches, the need to exercise care in interpreting the rwg and raw-score regression results, and the necessity of conducting WABA and supplemental within-entity WABA moderation analyses to gain meaningful insight into the phenomena being investigated. Implications and future directions for leadership theory and research are considered.

AB - A moderator subgroup study, originally published by Schriesheim and Murphy (1976), is reexamined using the within-group agreement coefficient (rwg; James, Demaree & Wolf, 1984), moderated raw-score multiple linear regression, and moderated within- and between-entity analysis (WABA; Dansereau, Alutto & Yammarino, 1984; Schriesheim, forthcoming). The results show serious discrepancies in results between the subgroup and regression approaches, the need to exercise care in interpreting the rwg and raw-score regression results, and the necessity of conducting WABA and supplemental within-entity WABA moderation analyses to gain meaningful insight into the phenomena being investigated. Implications and future directions for leadership theory and research are considered.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0000794783&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/1048-9843(95)90031-4

DO - 10.1016/1048-9843(95)90031-4

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0000794783

VL - 6

SP - 111

EP - 145

JO - Leadership Quarterly

JF - Leadership Quarterly

SN - 1048-9843

IS - 2

ER -