TY - JOUR
T1 - Integrating theoretical components
T2 - A graphical model for graduate students and researchers
AU - Choate, David M.
AU - Prather, Chelse M.
AU - Michel, Matt J.
AU - Baldridge, Ashley K.
AU - Barnes, Matthew A.
AU - Hoekman, David
AU - Patrick, Christopher J.
AU - RÜegg, Janine
AU - Crowl, Todd A.
PY - 2012/6
Y1 - 2012/6
N2 - The principles representing the broadest conceptual domains within ecology, which encompasses extremely broad spatial and temporal scales, have been identified in recent work. These broad scales present challenges to maintaining conceptual and theoretical clarity; however, theory development requires a clear understanding of theoretical components. Although researchers often test hypotheses using existing theories, many endeavors could benefit from a formal structure for examining the theoretical underpinnings of the researchers' work. We present a graphical model to organize the theoretical components underlying any particular research effort. We provide an example and suggest that scientists use this framework to present their research in a robust theoretical context. The benefits of this approach include accurately defining the theoretical components used in research; identifying novel questions while avoiding redundancy; and explicitly linking constituent theories, thereby facilitating integration. Many scientists aspire to have an impact on existing theory, and using this approach provides a succinct framework to identify how an individual's research affects ecological theory.
AB - The principles representing the broadest conceptual domains within ecology, which encompasses extremely broad spatial and temporal scales, have been identified in recent work. These broad scales present challenges to maintaining conceptual and theoretical clarity; however, theory development requires a clear understanding of theoretical components. Although researchers often test hypotheses using existing theories, many endeavors could benefit from a formal structure for examining the theoretical underpinnings of the researchers' work. We present a graphical model to organize the theoretical components underlying any particular research effort. We provide an example and suggest that scientists use this framework to present their research in a robust theoretical context. The benefits of this approach include accurately defining the theoretical components used in research; identifying novel questions while avoiding redundancy; and explicitly linking constituent theories, thereby facilitating integration. Many scientists aspire to have an impact on existing theory, and using this approach provides a succinct framework to identify how an individual's research affects ecological theory.
KW - Domain
KW - ecology
KW - integration
KW - philosophy of science
KW - theory
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84862569648&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1525/bio.2012.62.6.10
DO - 10.1525/bio.2012.62.6.10
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84862569648
VL - 62
SP - 594
EP - 602
JO - BioScience
JF - BioScience
SN - 0006-3568
IS - 6
ER -