TY - JOUR
T1 - Insights into reptile dermal contaminant exposure
T2 - Reptile skin permeability to pesticides
AU - Weir, Scott M.
AU - Talent, Larry G.
AU - Anderson, Todd A.
AU - Salice, Christopher J.
N1 - Funding Information:
SMW was provided funding by the Helen Jones foundation and the Office of the Provost of Texas Tech University . The authors thank S. Yu for help with chemical analysis of trifluralin and exposure setup. The authors thank laboratory volunteers who helped with necropsy and animal husbandry: S. Yu, S.C. Plautz, and D.A. Kimberly. This research was made possible by funding from S.L. Lance and the University of Georgia's Savannah River Ecology Laboratory for chemical analysis.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Elsevier Ltd.
PY - 2016/7/1
Y1 - 2016/7/1
N2 - There is growing interest in improving ecological risk assessment exposure estimation, specifically by incorporating dermal exposure. At the same time, there is a growing interest in amphibians and reptiles as receptors in ecological risk assessment, despite generally receiving less research than more traditional receptors. Previous research has suggested that dermal exposure may be more important than previously considered for reptiles. We measured reptile skin permeability to four pesticides (thiamethoxam, malathion, tebuthiuron, trifluralin) using ventral skin samples. All four pesticides penetrated the skin but generally had low permeability. There was no apparent relationship between physicochemical properties and permeability coefficients. Malathion had a significantly greater permeability rate at all time points compared to the other pesticides. Tebuthiuron had a greater permeability than thiamethoxam. Reptiles and mammals appear to have similar skin permeability suggesting that dermal exposure estimates for mammals may be representative of reptiles.
AB - There is growing interest in improving ecological risk assessment exposure estimation, specifically by incorporating dermal exposure. At the same time, there is a growing interest in amphibians and reptiles as receptors in ecological risk assessment, despite generally receiving less research than more traditional receptors. Previous research has suggested that dermal exposure may be more important than previously considered for reptiles. We measured reptile skin permeability to four pesticides (thiamethoxam, malathion, tebuthiuron, trifluralin) using ventral skin samples. All four pesticides penetrated the skin but generally had low permeability. There was no apparent relationship between physicochemical properties and permeability coefficients. Malathion had a significantly greater permeability rate at all time points compared to the other pesticides. Tebuthiuron had a greater permeability than thiamethoxam. Reptiles and mammals appear to have similar skin permeability suggesting that dermal exposure estimates for mammals may be representative of reptiles.
KW - Ecological risk assessment
KW - Herbicide
KW - Insecticide
KW - Lizard
KW - Percutaneous absorption
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84961904731&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.03.084
DO - 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.03.084
M3 - Article
C2 - 27037770
AN - SCOPUS:84961904731
SN - 0045-6535
VL - 154
SP - 17
EP - 22
JO - Chemosphere
JF - Chemosphere
ER -