TY - JOUR
T1 - In-season nitrogen status sensing in irrigated cotton
T2 - I. Yields and nitrogen-15 recovery
AU - Chua, Teresita T.
AU - Bronson, Kevin F.
AU - Booker, J. D.
AU - Keeling, J. Wayne
AU - Mosier, Arvin R.
AU - Bordovsky, James P.
AU - Lascano, Robert J.
AU - Green, Cary J.
AU - Segarra, Eduardo
PY - 2003
Y1 - 2003
N2 - Nitrogen recommendations for Upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) in the western USA are based on spring soil NO3--N tests. In-season monitoring of plant N status is another approach. Our primary objective was to test spectral reflectance and chlorophyll meter measurements as in-season N decision aids for irrigated cotton, and to compare these with soil test-based N management. The secondary objective was to determine the fate of 15N as affected by N management and irrigation modes. Urea ammonium nitrate was applied with low energy precision (LEPA) center-pivot, surface drip, and subsurface drip irrigation. Microplots received 3 atom% 15N. Soil test N application was based on 0- to 60-cm soil NO 3--N and 1400 kg lint ha-1 expected yield. Thirty-four kilograms of N per hectare was applied when green vegetative index (GVI) or chlorophyll meter readings relative to well-fertilized plots were <0.95. Lint yield responded to N at Lubbock in 2000 and 2001, but not at Ropesville. Nitrogen applied with in-season monitoring in 2000 at both sites was 34 to 101 kg N ha-1 less than soil test N application of 134 kg ha-1, with similar yields. In Lubbock, 2001 lint yields were near the expected yield, and in three of four cases, N applications with in-season monitoring equaled soil test N applications of 101 kg ha-1. Nitrogen-15 recovery in plants ranged from 19 to 38%, and was affected by N management in two of three site-years, but not by irrigation. This study indicates that basing N applications on in-season monitoring can reduce N applications in low yielding seasons and match the yield potential in high-yielding seasons.
AB - Nitrogen recommendations for Upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) in the western USA are based on spring soil NO3--N tests. In-season monitoring of plant N status is another approach. Our primary objective was to test spectral reflectance and chlorophyll meter measurements as in-season N decision aids for irrigated cotton, and to compare these with soil test-based N management. The secondary objective was to determine the fate of 15N as affected by N management and irrigation modes. Urea ammonium nitrate was applied with low energy precision (LEPA) center-pivot, surface drip, and subsurface drip irrigation. Microplots received 3 atom% 15N. Soil test N application was based on 0- to 60-cm soil NO 3--N and 1400 kg lint ha-1 expected yield. Thirty-four kilograms of N per hectare was applied when green vegetative index (GVI) or chlorophyll meter readings relative to well-fertilized plots were <0.95. Lint yield responded to N at Lubbock in 2000 and 2001, but not at Ropesville. Nitrogen applied with in-season monitoring in 2000 at both sites was 34 to 101 kg N ha-1 less than soil test N application of 134 kg ha-1, with similar yields. In Lubbock, 2001 lint yields were near the expected yield, and in three of four cases, N applications with in-season monitoring equaled soil test N applications of 101 kg ha-1. Nitrogen-15 recovery in plants ranged from 19 to 38%, and was affected by N management in two of three site-years, but not by irrigation. This study indicates that basing N applications on in-season monitoring can reduce N applications in low yielding seasons and match the yield potential in high-yielding seasons.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0141792083&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.2136/sssaj2003.1428
DO - 10.2136/sssaj2003.1428
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0141792083
SN - 0361-5995
VL - 67
SP - 1428
EP - 1438
JO - Soil Science Society of America Journal
JF - Soil Science Society of America Journal
IS - 5
ER -