Abstract
David Truncellito provides an analysis of Anselm’s ontological argument according to which Anselm’s use of the term ‘God’ equivocates between purported reference to a being and reference to the idea of that being. I argue that this interpretation does not capture Anselm’s intent, and offer another analysis of the argument that charges Anselm with a different equivocation.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 54-57 |
Journal | Philo |
State | Published - 2005 |