In Defense of Anselm

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

David Truncellito provides an analysis of Anselm’s ontological argument according to which Anselm’s use of the term ‘God’ equivocates between purported reference to a being and reference to the idea of that being. I argue that this interpretation does not capture Anselm’s intent, and offer another analysis of the argument that charges Anselm with a different equivocation.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)54-57
JournalPhilo
StatePublished - 2005

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'In Defense of Anselm'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this