TY - JOUR
T1 - Impulsive dispositions and alcohol
T2 - What we know, how we know it, and where to go from here
AU - Stevens, Angela K.
AU - Blanchard, Brittany E.
AU - Littlefield, Andrew K.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 The Author(s).
Copyright:
Copyright 2020 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2018/3/9
Y1 - 2018/3/9
N2 - Background: Relations between impulsigenic traits and alcohol-related outcomes have been the focus of much research, yet precise relations remain elusive. Historically, research used broadband conceptualizations of impulsivity, which yielded inconclusive findings. Attempts to ameliorate this problem led to more work on narrowband assessments of impulsivity. Despite that several narrowband self-report measures exist, few demonstrate adequate psychometric properties. Given the limits of self-report, researchers have also utilized laboratory-based measures of impulsive dispositions; however, this seems to have contributed more uncertainty to the literature. Review: We review commonly used self-report and laboratory-based measures of narrowband impulsivity, as well as assessments of alcohol-related constructs (e.g., consumption and consequences). We discuss remaining issues in impulsivity and alcohol assessment, which limit understanding of how impulsigenic traits influence alcohol-related behaviors. Cutting-edge conceptualizations and assessment of state-level impulsivity are also discussed. Conclusions: More work is necessary to further this area of research, including establishing consistent nomenclature and a cohesive conceptualization of impulsigenic traits as they relate to alcohol use and alcohol use disorders.
AB - Background: Relations between impulsigenic traits and alcohol-related outcomes have been the focus of much research, yet precise relations remain elusive. Historically, research used broadband conceptualizations of impulsivity, which yielded inconclusive findings. Attempts to ameliorate this problem led to more work on narrowband assessments of impulsivity. Despite that several narrowband self-report measures exist, few demonstrate adequate psychometric properties. Given the limits of self-report, researchers have also utilized laboratory-based measures of impulsive dispositions; however, this seems to have contributed more uncertainty to the literature. Review: We review commonly used self-report and laboratory-based measures of narrowband impulsivity, as well as assessments of alcohol-related constructs (e.g., consumption and consequences). We discuss remaining issues in impulsivity and alcohol assessment, which limit understanding of how impulsigenic traits influence alcohol-related behaviors. Cutting-edge conceptualizations and assessment of state-level impulsivity are also discussed. Conclusions: More work is necessary to further this area of research, including establishing consistent nomenclature and a cohesive conceptualization of impulsigenic traits as they relate to alcohol use and alcohol use disorders.
KW - Alcohol
KW - Alcohol use disorder
KW - Assessment
KW - Impulsivity
KW - Laboratory-based tasks
KW - Self-report
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85078174596&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1186/s40479-018-0081-0
DO - 10.1186/s40479-018-0081-0
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85078174596
VL - 5
JO - Borderline Personality Disorder and Emotion Dysregulation
JF - Borderline Personality Disorder and Emotion Dysregulation
SN - 2051-6673
IS - 1
M1 - 4
ER -