TY - JOUR
T1 - Impact Evaluation of Investments in the Appalachian Region
T2 - A Reappraisal
AU - Sayago-Gomez, Juan Tomás
AU - Piras, Gianfranco
AU - Jackson, Randall
AU - Lacombe, Donald
N1 - Funding Information:
This article is part of a more comprehensive analysis for the Appalachian Regional Commission, whose financial support is greatly appreciated. Thanks are due to Edward J. Feser and Henry Renski for comments and suggestions on preliminary versions of the research. The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2017.
PY - 2018/11/1
Y1 - 2018/11/1
N2 - We evaluate the impact of a half century of nontransportation Appalachian Regional Commission (ARC) investments on its constituent counties using quasi-experimental methods. We apply a set of propensity score methods and select the most appropriate matching algorithm for use in identifying the effects of policy implementation. The results of the analyses indicate that counties that received ARC funding grew faster than the control counties. The long-run per capita income growth rate in ARC investment counties was an average of 5.5 percent higher than in the control counties. Employment also grew significantly faster in these ARC counties than in the control counties for most of the study period. The average difference in the long-run employment growth rates between the counties that received ARC investments and those counties that did not was approximately 4.2 percent.
AB - We evaluate the impact of a half century of nontransportation Appalachian Regional Commission (ARC) investments on its constituent counties using quasi-experimental methods. We apply a set of propensity score methods and select the most appropriate matching algorithm for use in identifying the effects of policy implementation. The results of the analyses indicate that counties that received ARC funding grew faster than the control counties. The long-run per capita income growth rate in ARC investment counties was an average of 5.5 percent higher than in the control counties. Employment also grew significantly faster in these ARC counties than in the control counties for most of the study period. The average difference in the long-run employment growth rates between the counties that received ARC investments and those counties that did not was approximately 4.2 percent.
KW - matching algorithms
KW - quasi-experimental methods
KW - regional economic development
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85043464514&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/0160017617713822
DO - 10.1177/0160017617713822
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85043464514
SN - 0160-0176
VL - 41
SP - 601
EP - 629
JO - International Regional Science Review
JF - International Regional Science Review
IS - 6
ER -