How to discuss a paper: Developing and showcasing your scholarly skills

Kirsten A. Cook, Matthew Hart, Michael R. Kinney, Derek K. Oler

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

We offer this paper as a primer for accounting doctoral students and new faculty on how to discuss a paper. We believe that this topic can serve to ‘‘jump start’’ the engagement of students and junior faculty in developing and delivering quality discussions. We begin by emphasizing the importance and benefits of being a good discussant to both the profession and the discussant. We then outline the discussion process and provide detailed suggestions on points to consider in each phase of this process: (1) volunteering to discuss, (2) receiving the discussion assignment, (3) preparing the discussion, (4) presenting the discussion, and (5) following up with the authors after the discussion. Next, we examine data that highlight the need for additional discussant volunteers at conferences. Finally, we present possible innovations to foster high-quality discussions. This paper formalizes the ideal process typically learned through years of mentoring and conference experience.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)211-218
Number of pages8
JournalIssues in Accounting Education
Volume31
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2016

Keywords

  • Accounting research
  • Discussing
  • Doctoral education
  • Reviewing

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'How to discuss a paper: Developing and showcasing your scholarly skills'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this