How Do Firms Respond to a Non-Income Tax? The Interplay between Non-Income Taxes and Income Tax Avoidance

G. Ryan Huston, Yangmei Wang, Tiankai Wang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

SYNOPSIS: The Medical Device Excise Tax (MDET) enacted a 2.3 percent tax on domestic sales of certain medical devices. Medical device firms suggested the tax would reduce profitability, leading to cuts in employees, research and development, and capital expenditures. However, we find that medical device firms engaged in more income tax avoidance in response to the MDET. Furthermore, medical device firms with high income tax avoidance made no significant cuts to investment spending or employees, whereas firms with low income tax avoidance significantly decreased investment spending and employees. Our findings suggest that some medical device firms used income tax avoidance as a substitute for reducing investment spending. Our results serve to inform both researchers and policymakers regarding the interplay between non-income taxes and income tax avoidance.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)97-116
Number of pages20
JournalAccounting Horizons
Volume37
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2023

Keywords

  • analyst forecasts
  • income tax avoidance
  • investment spending
  • medical device excise tax
  • stock market reaction
  • tax incidence

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'How Do Firms Respond to a Non-Income Tax? The Interplay between Non-Income Taxes and Income Tax Avoidance'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this