Grandstanding: The Use and Abuse of Moral Talk

Justin Tosi, Brandon Warmke

Research output: Book/ReportBookpeer-review

Abstract

We are all guilty of it. We call people terrible names in conversation or online. We vilify those with whom we disagree, and make bolder claims than we could defend. We want to be seen as taking the moral high ground not just to make a point, or move a debate forward, but to look a certain way--incensed, or compassionate, or committed to a cause. We exaggerate. In other words, we grandstand.<br><br>Nowhere is this more evident than in public discourse today, and especially as it plays out across the internet. To philosophers Justin Tosi and Brandon Warmke, who have written extensively about moral grandstanding, such one-upmanship is not just annoying, but dangerous. As politics gets more and more polarized, people on both sides of the spectrum move further and further apart when they let grandstanding get in the way of engaging one another. The pollution of our most urgent conversations with self-interest damages the very causes they are meant to forward.<br><br>Drawing from work in p
Original languageEnglish
PublisherOxford University Press
ISBN (Print)9780190900151
StatePublished - Jul 6 2020

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Grandstanding: The Use and Abuse of Moral Talk'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this