Global introductions of crayfishes: Evaluating the impact of species invasions on ecosystem services

David M. Lodge, Andrew Deines, Francesca Gherardi, Darren C.J. Yeo, Tracy Arcella, Ashley K. Baldridge, Matthew A. Barnes, W. Lindsay Chadderton, Jeffrey L. Feder, Crysta A. Gantz, Geoffrey W. Howard, Christopher L. Jerde, Brett W. Peters, Jody A. Peters, Lindsey W. Sargent, Cameron R. Turner, Marion E. Wittmann, Yiwen Zeng

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

194 Scopus citations


Impacts of nonindigenous crayfishes on ecosystem services exemplify the mixture of positive and negative effects of intentionally introduced species. Global introductions for aquaculture and ornamental purposes have begun to homogenize naturally disjunct global distributions of crayfish families. Negative impacts include the loss of provisioning (e.g., reductions in edible native species, reproductive interference or hybridization with native crayfishes), regulatory (e.g., lethal disease spread, increased costs to agriculture and water management), supporting (e.g., large changes in ecological communities), and cultural (e.g., loss of festivals celebrating native crayfish) services. Where quantification of impacts exists (e.g., Procambarus clarkii and Pacifastacus leniusculus in Europe), regulations now prohibit introduction and spread of crayfishes, indicating that losses of ecosystem services have outweighed gains. Recent research advances such as predicting invasiveness, predicting spread, improved detection and control, and bioeconomic analysis to increase cost-effectiveness of management could be employed to reduce future losses of ecosystem services.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)449-472
Number of pages24
JournalAnnual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics
StatePublished - Dec 2012


  • bioeconomics
  • biogeography
  • exotic species
  • management


Dive into the research topics of 'Global introductions of crayfishes: Evaluating the impact of species invasions on ecosystem services'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this