Factors that influence accounting faculty career satisfaction: Comparisons by program prestige and tenure status

Gary M. Fleischman; Teresa Stephenson; Kenton B. Walker; Kirsten A. Cook

doi:10.2308/acch-51713

Factors that influence accounting faculty career satisfaction: Comparisons by program prestige and tenure status

Gary M. Fleischman, Teresa Stephenson, Kenton B. Walker, Kirsten A. Cook

Business Administration

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

SYNOPSIS: We report results of 266 surveys from untenured and tenured accounting faculty employed by both elite and non-elite accounting programs concerning factors that influence career satisfaction. We find that accounting academics are somewhat satisfied with their jobs, although factors that enhance or impair career satisfaction differ for faculty at elite versus non-elite programs and for untenured versus tenured faculty. Our findings suggest noteworthy implications for the accounting academy and provide insights about cultural differences between elite versus non-elite accounting programs.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	1-20
Number of pages	20
Journal	Accounting Horizons
Volume	31
Issue number	3
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.2308/acch-51713
State	Published - Sep 2017

Keywords

Accounting professor career satisfaction
Elite accounting programs
Non-elite accounting programs
Pathways commission

Access to Document

10.2308/acch-51713

Link to publication in Scopus

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Factors that influence accounting faculty career satisfaction: Comparisons by program prestige and tenure status'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this

@article{647c1419a945499d8ec36b3697698953,

title = "Factors that influence accounting faculty career satisfaction: Comparisons by program prestige and tenure status",

abstract = "SYNOPSIS: We report results of 266 surveys from untenured and tenured accounting faculty employed by both elite and non-elite accounting programs concerning factors that influence career satisfaction. We find that accounting academics are somewhat satisfied with their jobs, although factors that enhance or impair career satisfaction differ for faculty at elite versus non-elite programs and for untenured versus tenured faculty. Our findings suggest noteworthy implications for the accounting academy and provide insights about cultural differences between elite versus non-elite accounting programs.",

keywords = "Accounting professor career satisfaction, Elite accounting programs, Non-elite accounting programs, Pathways commission",

author = "Fleischman, {Gary M.} and Teresa Stephenson and Walker, {Kenton B.} and Cook, {Kirsten A.}",

year = "2017",

month = sep,

doi = "10.2308/acch-51713",

language = "English",

volume = "31",

pages = "1--20",

journal = "Accounting Horizons",

issn = "0888-7993",

number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Factors that influence accounting faculty career satisfaction

T2 - Comparisons by program prestige and tenure status

AU - Fleischman, Gary M.

AU - Stephenson, Teresa

AU - Walker, Kenton B.

AU - Cook, Kirsten A.

PY - 2017/9

Y1 - 2017/9

N2 - SYNOPSIS: We report results of 266 surveys from untenured and tenured accounting faculty employed by both elite and non-elite accounting programs concerning factors that influence career satisfaction. We find that accounting academics are somewhat satisfied with their jobs, although factors that enhance or impair career satisfaction differ for faculty at elite versus non-elite programs and for untenured versus tenured faculty. Our findings suggest noteworthy implications for the accounting academy and provide insights about cultural differences between elite versus non-elite accounting programs.

AB - SYNOPSIS: We report results of 266 surveys from untenured and tenured accounting faculty employed by both elite and non-elite accounting programs concerning factors that influence career satisfaction. We find that accounting academics are somewhat satisfied with their jobs, although factors that enhance or impair career satisfaction differ for faculty at elite versus non-elite programs and for untenured versus tenured faculty. Our findings suggest noteworthy implications for the accounting academy and provide insights about cultural differences between elite versus non-elite accounting programs.

KW - Accounting professor career satisfaction

KW - Elite accounting programs

KW - Non-elite accounting programs

KW - Pathways commission

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85027007268&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2308/acch-51713

DO - 10.2308/acch-51713

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85027007268

VL - 31

SP - 1

EP - 20

JO - Accounting Horizons

JF - Accounting Horizons

SN - 0888-7993

IS - 3

ER -