TY - JOUR
T1 - Experimental and numerical study of enhanced condensate recovery by gas injection in shale gas-condensate reservoirs
AU - Meng, Xingbang
AU - Sheng, James J.
AU - Yu, Yang
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2017 Society of Petroleum Engineers.
PY - 2017/5/1
Y1 - 2017/5/1
N2 - This paper examines the potential of huff 'n' puff gas-injection method to recover condensate in shale gas-condensate reservoirs by conducting experiments on a shale core. Numerical models were developed to verify experiment results. Our laboratory study shows that condensate recovery was increased to 25% by applying huff 'n' puff gas injection on a shale core. Also, we compared the efficiency of huff 'n' puff gas injection with that of gasflooding. At the end of same flooding with time that is the same as the time for five huff 'n' puff cycles, the condensate recovery is 19%. From the experimental results, we found that huff 'n' puff was more effective than gasflooding. During the experiment, condensate accumulated near the production-end region. In the huff 'n' puff process, because the location for injection in the core was the same as that for production, the pressure in the condensate region built up faster than pressure in the flooding experiment. Also, because of the ultralow permeability, the pressure propagation was much slower in the shale core than in a conventional reservoir core, and the efficiency of gasflooding is much lower than that of the huff 'n' puff. This study indicates that huff 'n' puff has the potential to effectively enhance condensate recovery in shale gas--condensate reservoirs.
AB - This paper examines the potential of huff 'n' puff gas-injection method to recover condensate in shale gas-condensate reservoirs by conducting experiments on a shale core. Numerical models were developed to verify experiment results. Our laboratory study shows that condensate recovery was increased to 25% by applying huff 'n' puff gas injection on a shale core. Also, we compared the efficiency of huff 'n' puff gas injection with that of gasflooding. At the end of same flooding with time that is the same as the time for five huff 'n' puff cycles, the condensate recovery is 19%. From the experimental results, we found that huff 'n' puff was more effective than gasflooding. During the experiment, condensate accumulated near the production-end region. In the huff 'n' puff process, because the location for injection in the core was the same as that for production, the pressure in the condensate region built up faster than pressure in the flooding experiment. Also, because of the ultralow permeability, the pressure propagation was much slower in the shale core than in a conventional reservoir core, and the efficiency of gasflooding is much lower than that of the huff 'n' puff. This study indicates that huff 'n' puff has the potential to effectively enhance condensate recovery in shale gas--condensate reservoirs.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85035804503&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.2118/183645-PA
DO - 10.2118/183645-PA
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85035804503
SN - 1094-6470
VL - 20
SP - 471
EP - 477
JO - SPE Reservoir Evaluation and Engineering
JF - SPE Reservoir Evaluation and Engineering
IS - 2
ER -